There’s some crazy stuff out there about tribunals, executions, body doubles, AI cloning, etc. . . Sadly, I’m at the point I might believe anything. But, since I’m new to these parts and fear that I might sound like a crazed consp theorist (which my family thinks) . . . I’ll start with the question of tribunals. BTW it’s taken me a while to build the courage to ask, so take it easy on me plz.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
Then wait, I suppose. The entire premise of Q also rests on “you have to let everyone see“ in order to awaken. Not "here's this one thing," and “here's another," but a sewing of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
For the lawyer members, have them think about it as casting doubt on the assertion (criminal) vs. what you're asking for which is a "preponderance of evidence,“ (civil).
Shift either your burden or their burden.
If an alarm goes off at 11:30am every day, prove to me without looking at the clock that it's not set to 11:30pm and the clock isn't set incorrectly. Or, accept that being set icorrectly is heresay but the alarm at 11:30 is true.
Are you looking for argumentative support or are you looking to refute by demanding standards for acceptance you haven't defined?
Argumentative support, definitely.
Isn't the military justice based on criminal law? Maybe I better listen to Senator Graham questioning Kavanaugh on that again.
Not a lawfag which makes it even tougher.
But, I am into discerning TRUTH, and my method of validation often involves waiting (+searching) for more information to be revealed.
I think, with regards to Gitmo related stuff or executions, it's a waiting to see what's revealed, if ever, game.
There are the hints and nods.- scavino tweets of Eagle in ice, etc. - that can be interpreted but offer no eureka proof.
Trump is still fighting declas battles on lesser stuff, so I can't imagine irrefutable proof on Gitmo cases getting dropped, unless it all comes in a wave.