I'm not saying that if true, it would NOT be a massive issue, and have plenty to do with NAT Security. But let's face it, if NONE of it is true in any way, Obama is STILL a massive threat to nat. security. Based on plenty of stuff that is not tabloid and for which solid, non-sensational evidence exists.
However, I find it hard to conceive that they would stack their manchurian candidate with that sort of problem. But, I have to admit, just about everything I've seen reported as 'evidence' of Big Mike has simply failed to pass the whiff test.
I'm not saying that if true, it would NOT be a massive issue, and have plenty to do with NAT Security. But let's face it, if NONE of it is true in any way, Obama is STILL a massive threat to nat. security. Based on plenty of stuff that is not tabloid and for which solid, non-sensational evidence exists. However, I find it hard to conceive that they would stack their manchurian candidate with that sort of problem. But, I have to admit, just about everything I've seen reported as 'evidence' of Big Mike has simply failed to pass the whiff test.