Lurker here. flame me maybe. Not into, and havent followed religiously hardcore fringe conspiracy theories for quite some time but.....reading several correlative Q posts over a year and twatter habits. It appears to me based on content and substance L Wood is Q. is this OLD news? I havent found any connection stating otherwise. If this is widely known forgive the ignorance of ultimate awakened internet supremacy of known knowledge but this appears quite obvious. If this is not widely known. Thoughts? correlative light to dark and occasional christian references amongst the undeniable content of intended thought provocation questioning each and and every time appears obvious to me
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
this is what I am trying to understand. No front, no object reality or alternative aspect to any of this. Just free and fair correspondence and truth exchange
if there are known sources I am intrigued to see any and all in relation to this topic.
I have been unable to find any real sources verifiable to this particular topic hence my driving questing and ascertainions of conceptual correlation. This seems very relevant to open discussion and knowledge sharing giving the stakes and content of this subject matter. On a level that is of exponential importance based on truth "bombs" and info sharing in the last few weeks
Absolutely, far reaching research. I dont pose a question on a site i lurk on. What i dont do i throw the entire easter basket into a fringe channel conspiracy thesis to conclude certainty. All to attributed to the current state of "knowledge" projected and regurgitated on the internet these days on fan boi perspectiveology. lol but it was interseting to preruse. but simple reaffirms to me why the inequivacle question of responsibility through bomb shell solace is all entirely unknown by so many. I have done extensive "research" but all within lays the underlying internet perspective regurgitated here. interesting none the less no more substantiated than as expected.