Research and reading provides the means to digest and understand what is transpiring. Making a statement such as "What does watching a movie mean?" is implicit that you have not read any Q drops at all. Every person that has seriously looked into Q, has indeed done the requisite research, and proved things out for themselves understands completely what the phrase "you are watching a movie" means. That being established as a baseline shows you are not seriously asking a question. U/Grief answered your question and you didn't even bother to acknowledge his response, yet you go on to ask other inane questions, again which points out that you are not seriously here for information. It's almost as if you are intentionally reading from a script yourself.
So, please explain how are you being shouted down? I didn't see anyone do that to you, and I know that I didn't. If correcting someone via calm dialogue is "shouting someone down" then your professors wasted your time and money with frivolous rhetoric. Free speech is not a one way street, your right to say something ridiculous is as legitimate as is someone who agrees or criticizes your idea. It is one thing to ask a legitimate question, it is another thing to start other responses on completely odd tangents as you have done. You sound like the interviewee who states "I was former republican voter", who is proved later to still be a registered democrat.
When you get your thoughts together and are serious, please post your thoughts in a cogent manner instead of shotgunning a word salad on TGW. Words are important, they are ideas manifested, properly done, they can have a real impact and make a difference. When your words and thoughts are a scattered, you won't and shouldn't be taken seriously.
And by the way, I don't have a narrative that needs to be fit, I am along for the ride just as everyone else here. It does however appear that you have a scattered narrative to push on TGA.
Research and reading provides the means to digest and understand what is transpiring. Making a statement such as "What does watching a movie mean?" is implicit that you have not read any Q drops at all. Every person that has seriously looked into Q, has indeed done the requisite research, and proved things out for themselves understands completely what the phrase "you are watching a movie" means. That being established as a baseline shows you are not seriously asking a question. U/Grief answered your question and you didn't even bother to acknowledge his response, yet you go on to ask other inane questions, again which points out that you are not seriously here for information. It's almost as if you are intentionally reading from a script yourself.
So, please explain how are you being shouted down? I didn't see anyone do that to you, and I know that I didn't. If correcting someone via calm dialogue is "shouting someone down" then your professors wasted your time and money with frivolous rhetoric. Free speech is not a one way street, your right to say something ridiculous is as legitimate as is someone who agrees or criticizes your idea. It is one thing to ask a legitimate question, it is another thing to start other responses on completely odd tangents as you have done. You sound like the interviewee who states "I was former republican voter", who is proved later to still be a registered democrat.
When you get your thoughts together and are serious, please post your thoughts in a cogent manner instead of shotgunning a word salad on TGW. Words are important, they are ideas manifested, properly done, they can have a real impact and make a difference. When your words and thoughts are a scattered, you won't and shouldn't be taken seriously.
And by the way, I don't have a narrative that needs to be fit, I am along for the ride just as everyone else here. It does however appear that you have a scattered narrative to push on TGA.