I think I understand why Trump's speech ran past when congress started voting...not that complicated actually. - The Great Awakening

I think I understand why Trump's speech ran past when congress started voting...not that complicated actually.

posted 3 years ago by we_kill_creativity 3 years ago by we_kill_creativity +294 / -0

According to this post, Trump was physically at the rally and could have started the speech on time: https://greatawakening.win/p/11RhFbQ2gV/if-trump-knew-that-pence-would-b/

I would assume team Trump knew what antifa was going to do at the capitol building, so they left "on time" so Antifa thought the clock was ticking. Then they waited and MADE SURE the speech went long so the majority of Trump supporters WERE NOT there when they tried to breach the capitol building.

As I was watching the speech I kept wondering to myself why the hell he was still talking while the voting was starting. I eventually stopped watching the speech to watch the voting. I went on a drive to clear my head when I realized it was going to take all day. 20 minutes later I was back home and the capitol had been "overrun"...I thought to myself..."That was fast."

65 comments

65 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (65)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– GrannyPaine 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

He also said it would get boring because he was going to lay out all those numbers.

One thing that caught my attention - he was talking about voting discrepancies in one of the states and it was 17000-something votes. He really leaned into the word "seventeen", several times in fact. Did anyone else catch that? I'm new to a lot of this so forgive my ignorance if I've gotten something wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Patriot_Grazer 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Ive noticed this as well. Every time he says 17, he places emphasis on it.