Q Post 2793
Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.
Ability to prevent cross-talk narrows comms only to FAKE NEWS which provides for more control over what is released to inform the public.
A series of scenarios is currently being conducted ['game the sys'] to test response, risk, and calc results.
'Censorship' [added] layers of inserted code 'through keyword targeting' in bio, history, and comments + indiv platform mods has failed to curtail the problem.
'China-Russia-Iran' 'fake' take-down hacks of select platforms (for maintenance) is one scenario being game-played.
[Zero-Day]
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled new video stream platform
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q
In regards to WH (whitehat?) controlled new RT 'news' site and video stream platform, am I right in assuming that these would be Parler and Rumble?
The white house is going to roll out a completely new communications system??
WH = white hat
What does white hat mean or reference to
No, I thought "WH" always stood for "White House" Usually, "White Hat" is simply written out & not abbreviated.
Am I wrong?
asking the wrong person maybe some other anon knows
white hat hackers = good guys aka ethical hackers.
black hat hackers = bad guys aka illegal hacking for illegal/nefarious purposes
thank you