So to my understanding, elected officials gathered to certify or object to the electoral votes for biden. The protest took place. People, possibly paid by the left, leisurely walked around the capitol. During this time, elected officials swarmed away like rats for recess. After the building was sweeped and secured, the elected officials reconvened.
Before the breach, how many people were willing to object? I thought Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania and 2 to 3 others had objections signed by reps and senators.
After the breach, objections were dropped from 5-7 states down to 2, az and pa.
What on earth happened on 1/6/21 to make people change their opinion on what happen on 11/3/20 - 12/??/20. How did the breach of the capitol alter their opinion on the fraud that happened 2 months prior?
Good question...
That is what a lot of us are trying to figure out.
Short answer.. treason
Exactly, because the fraud that occurred on Nov 3rd is completely separate from the Capital incident. Apple and Oranges. If they truly were going to stand up against the fraud ,they still would have. All planned into giving the RINOs an out and use scare tactics on the others.Got to say one thing they do seem to always have every base covered. others. Really need to see something go down or someone go down real soon or im gonna have a heart attack!
It shouldn't alter their opinion, that's the point. I don't think they really wanted to object in the first place, but they are just making excuses or they realize that it is futile. They all are just playing their part.
Q said the military is the only way.
They don’t look into the fraud because they are a part of it. This is why it’s so scary.
There might've been others, but Kelly Loeffler was the one that I particularly know about. She said on the 6th, that while she had planned to object to Georgia's electors being certified to protect democracy, she changed her mind because of the "riots" earlier in the day. But, as the woman on Steve Bannon's show said, "The facts didn't change (about Georgia's election being done fraudulently)."
Pandering?
Well obviously she was lying and has no integrity.
I havent heard steve bannons show, but this is exactly what my post was about. It makes no sense.
I listened to his newest episode as of the 7th, so if it's still on youtube you can find the clip/audio of Loeffler in that episode.
Thats most certainly how it feels, but think about how wrong that is. We're not children being displined by our parents. We're adults in "the land of the free", and the people we pay are treating us like children.
Because there's a r difference between the threat of mob rule (which is what they have control over with BLM and Antifa) and actual mob rule (which is how they view the millions of people assembled around "the People's House").
" They" see US as mob rule rather than the people for whom Constiutional rule of law exists. Truthfully, they support neither mob rule nor constitutional rule of law. They support themselves and their own objectives.
I understand that, but it isnt really my question I guess. What I am asking is similar to if your favorite sports team got screwed over in the championship game. You watched the game, you saw the instant replay, and you decided "hey, the refs definitely made the wrong call here". You believed this to the point where you would sign off on it.
Then 2 months pass by and its reported that your star rb beat his gf last night. Did you still get cheated out of the game 2 months ago?
Logical answer is yes, the actions happening 2 months later do not diminish what happened prior.
With the vote, they did the complete opposite. They changed their mind about election fraud in November because of a riot in January. These two things are not related and should not reflect on eachother, but they did.
Feelings and emotions are being used to make decisions versus strong logic and critical thinking.