Lin Wood has been right about some important things but has also been compared with a "carnival barker". This morning's Parler post about the Pope being arrested from a garbage page is especially difficult to excuse.
Is there a plausible "white hat" explanation for his posting?
Is it possible for a tremendously successful attorney to also be a naïve boomerposter?
Is he playing a role?
He's also a lawyer, so he knows he would be sued for what he says if it isn't true.
Think about it, nobody has defended themselves from what he said, if half the shit he has said is true that's frightening, and nobody has defended themselves against any of it...
He wouldn't put himself in a position where he makes claims that wild if he couldn't back it up.
nobody would bother to sue Lin Wood for mis-reporting that the Pope is being arrested
the OP raises a fair point - Lin scored a hit on Pence backstabbing the president and the republic. I believe Justice Roberts is corrupt and probably at some level was in on Scalia being taken out
the bogus stuff being spewed about the Vatican and the Pope, that is not really being backed up by sauce - pretty sloppy of him to push that
so when Lin Wood says Apple will do an update on iPhones to disable the presidential emergency alert, how does he know this (has it happened to anyone?)
when Lin Wood says Pres. Trump will put out a message over the EMS, how would he know anything about that - other than speculating like everyone else?
Actually it is it has been picked up by many.
there's a fair amount of echo chamber reporting based on citing same so-called sources
when pope is delivering a mass today, then clearly he himself wasn't arrested
so source quality is clearly in question on all this Vatican stuff
The Pope’s message could have been pre-recorded.