Lin Wood has been right about some important things but has also been compared with a "carnival barker". This morning's Parler post about the Pope being arrested from a garbage page is especially difficult to excuse.
Is there a plausible "white hat" explanation for his posting?
Is it possible for a tremendously successful attorney to also be a naïve boomerposter?
Is he playing a role?
He's also a lawyer, so he knows he would be sued for what he says if it isn't true.
Think about it, nobody has defended themselves from what he said, if half the shit he has said is true that's frightening, and nobody has defended themselves against any of it...
He wouldn't put himself in a position where he makes claims that wild if he couldn't back it up.
nobody would bother to sue Lin Wood for mis-reporting that the Pope is being arrested
the OP raises a fair point - Lin scored a hit on Pence backstabbing the president and the republic. I believe Justice Roberts is corrupt and probably at some level was in on Scalia being taken out
the bogus stuff being spewed about the Vatican and the Pope, that is not really being backed up by sauce - pretty sloppy of him to push that
so when Lin Wood says Apple will do an update on iPhones to disable the presidential emergency alert, how does he know this (has it happened to anyone?)
when Lin Wood says Pres. Trump will put out a message over the EMS, how would he know anything about that - other than speculating like everyone else?
And to be fair about the Pence thing, I seriously thought he was crazy, then a couple days later, it actually happened. There are arguments about whether Pence is playing a role in all this, and that question mark colors Lin's contributions. Just don't really know yet.
To be a little more fair, when I see something he's reporting, I look for it in another place too. He can't post things that aren't accurate. I think he'd be putting his whole livelihood on the line by behaving badly.
there's the possibility that he doesn't have to really worry about making a livelihood going forward as an attorney and he's just out putting it all on the line, perhaps engaging in some speculation spring-boarding off of stuff he's come upon in various ways
he's probably not really any kind of insider, is where I'm tending to land, and hence what he says has to be taken with a grain of salt per each specific case of "info"
Could be information warfare?
Apple hasn't come out and said one way or other.
That's kind of my point, if somebody calls you a pedo-ass who diddles kids, you're probably going to defend yourself, no?
Unless it was true.
That's all I'm saying.
Yeah, it would suck at trial to have Lin Wood pull out some videos of sex abuse. The logic is pretty solid.
Don't wanna be on that jury.
Likely why the military is going to be the ones to judge them. Us civilians (and soldiers, too) would struggle to mentally withstand that kind of stuff.
Actually it is it has been picked up by many.
there's a fair amount of echo chamber reporting based on citing same so-called sources
when pope is delivering a mass today, then clearly he himself wasn't arrested
so source quality is clearly in question on all this Vatican stuff
The Pope’s message could have been pre-recorded.
Well his echoing of the grotesque aShLi iS aLiVe vid was the end as for me.
Exactly, it's far from unbelievable when you consider all of it.
And we still don't know everything.
great post, thanks for being logical. I can show my family this one, will help them understand Lin Wood better.
What Lin writes doesn't sound crazy at all. It's the Q research we've been discussing for the past three years going mainstream.