Also there are other 6 other videos from the phones of the defendant's friends, all showing the same crime: the defendant rapes and then murders the victim.
But, you decide NOT to introduce the confession or any of the videos of the crime. Because it might upset the jury/courtroom and it seems unsportsmanlike to slam-dunk the defendant like that. You decide to just try the case on the other circumstancial evidence instead.
In the end, the defendant is found not guilty and walks. Plus, he sues the estate/family of the victim for damages and court costs.
By not invoking the Insurrection Act , this is basically the equivalent of what Trump would be doing. How many people think he's going to NOT invoke the Insurrection Act?
What would this involve and who would deem it as such?
Anything and everything at the president's pleasure.
President doesn't need congress.
US under state of emergency from Chinese hacking for years. Obama made cyber hacking an act of war.
So is interference in a critical infrastructure like voting.
As L Graham asked Kavanaugh, anyone involved in abetting the enemy is an enemy combatant and has their constitutional rights suspended.
Thanks, and what’s the difference between the Insurrection Act and Martial Law?
Martial Law is suspension of civil governance.
IA allows military to pacify an insurrection / rebellion.
To add to your comment... It also allows the military to ACT AGAINST American citizens on American soil...