BUT is this possibly legally dubious as far as the Insurrection Act go? I ask because it seems like the proclamation and SoE in DC are unrelated at face value (proclamation was said in such a way that the MSM and public could think it is about MAGA, SoE for as of yet publicly unknown reasons).
Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knows what the real insurrection is and it is all connected, BUT can you invoke under the guise of these seemingly two disparate incidents / events? Or is his cover that both the proclamation and SoE are due to MAGA supporters?
Let me explain further. Trump didn't do anything wrong. His crowd was an hour behind the rioters.
His team used an opportunity created by the Democrats to seize the devices. The Democrats were hoping to create an Reichstag Fire. They got a bunch of patriots walking between the velvet ropes.
I suspected as such when I read this tweet. I was like you evil genius! Casualties of war? Trumps deleted tweet
“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!” Deleted after 1 hour at 7:15 PM on 06 Jan.
Remember this day forever! Curious wording there to me. Quite possible he called for a huge rally to subvert a much bigger plot. Think dnc n rnc bomb plots. Which seems to have been done by amateurs this whole shit is sick I can’t believe there is still people in this country that swallow up 10 sec clips on MSM
Of course I don't want a "shit hole district with an Obama judge" to try these assholes.
I'm simply asking questions. I believe in the rationale that commiting a crime to obtain evidence is still commiting a crime, and I don't want criminals to be prosecuting as a matter of integrity.
Correct and it also served a cover to have military white hats go into the capital to get the laptops and hard drives of the traitors.
BUT is this possibly legally dubious as far as the Insurrection Act go? I ask because it seems like the proclamation and SoE in DC are unrelated at face value (proclamation was said in such a way that the MSM and public could think it is about MAGA, SoE for as of yet publicly unknown reasons).
Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear knows what the real insurrection is and it is all connected, BUT can you invoke under the guise of these seemingly two disparate incidents / events? Or is his cover that both the proclamation and SoE are due to MAGA supporters?
Let me explain further. Trump didn't do anything wrong. His crowd was an hour behind the rioters.
His team used an opportunity created by the Democrats to seize the devices. The Democrats were hoping to create an Reichstag Fire. They got a bunch of patriots walking between the velvet ropes.
I suspected as such when I read this tweet. I was like you evil genius! Casualties of war? Trumps deleted tweet
“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!” Deleted after 1 hour at 7:15 PM on 06 Jan.
Remember this day forever! Curious wording there to me. Quite possible he called for a huge rally to subvert a much bigger plot. Think dnc n rnc bomb plots. Which seems to have been done by amateurs this whole shit is sick I can’t believe there is still people in this country that swallow up 10 sec clips on MSM
Legal for civilians? No.
Legal for the military? Yes.
Wouldn't any evidence on those stolen laptops be considered fruit of the poison tree?
Civil trial, yes.
Military trial, no.
What, did you think we're going to try these assholes in some shit hole district court with an Obama judge?! Hahaha!!!
Of course I don't want a "shit hole district with an Obama judge" to try these assholes.
I'm simply asking questions. I believe in the rationale that commiting a crime to obtain evidence is still commiting a crime, and I don't want criminals to be prosecuting as a matter of integrity.