Well if their contents are copied or leaked while "stolen" then there's nothing they could refute legally there.
But im starting to rethink it after reading another anons comment about the stolen laptops being cover for the white hat clean up teams who then confiscated them with authority.
There is that as well, I did not see that the person Greydle originally responded to was not you haha. Saying that any information would be admissible as evidence in a military tribunal.
And they may be right, still. I know the legal system, but am less familiar with the rules of Military Justice.
Well if their contents are copied or leaked while "stolen" then there's nothing they could refute legally there.
But im starting to rethink it after reading another anons comment about the stolen laptops being cover for the white hat clean up teams who then confiscated them with authority.
There is that as well, I did not see that the person Greydle originally responded to was not you haha. Saying that any information would be admissible as evidence in a military tribunal.
And they may be right, still. I know the legal system, but am less familiar with the rules of Military Justice.
In any case, thank you for your response.