35
posted ago by MAGAdeburger ago by MAGAdeburger +35 / -0

Late to the game, but have been spending lots of time trying to get up to speed. Decided to finally make an account to comment on the possible connections with "Alamo." Yes, POTUS was not at THE Alamo, but the connection of speaking at Alamo, TX cannot just be coincidence. Yes, POTUS mentioned for the first time, a "Biden Administration", within the context of warning how this push to use the 25 Amendment could be turned and used on Biden. Could Trump not be innaugurated on the 20th and Biden be innaugurated? This possibility has to be taken seriously. Let's assume that this does happen. In that context, then perhaps this is Trump's "Alamo" moment. He fought to the metaphorical "political death" but to aid a greater purpose. Remember, had it not been for the sacrifices made at the Alamo, Houston would not have had the time to organize his army, and the people would not have had the rallying cry of "Remember the Alamo." Perhaps Trump has been following a strategy of acting as a delaying tactic? Even if all seems lost, he's at the least massively delayed the enemy. He's bought time for the good powers that be, to organize an army and implement a sound strategy. His "death" will rally more to support the cause and further strengthen the resolve of those already fighting. Sometimes battles must be lost, in order to win the war. If Biden is inaugurated, all is not lost. Santa Anna might have taken the Alamo, but his hubris cost him the war.