are trying to ascertain if it's still possible or not.
No, you're not.
But maybe asking Qs are no longer allowed?
When your question is "When will you accept defeat? Will it be when my imaginary hypothetical happens?", the answer is shove it up your ass.
You know what is counterproductive? Faulty logic.
You devised a hypothetical outcome that is the complete antithesis of Q, then demanded we accept your outcome as real as we elaborate on how we'll feel when your antithesis happens.
I never asked for how anyone will "feel", the original text is still up there.
Your rephrasing of my question into your proposed assumptions of what you think it means is totally incorrect. I am completely attempting to ascertain what is going on.
I'll say it again since your have a reading comprehension issue -- the OP is the one that said to dismiss POTUS speech yesterday as counter signal, should we apply that logic if an inauguration is broadcast in 7 days?
It's a pretty simple Q and not nefarious like you attribute.
It's all about how much brain power you can muster to crunch all the data points.
Trump's book was named "The Art of the Deal". He named it as such because he values Sun Tzu's "The Art of War". One of Sun Tzu's most famous sayings is "Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak."
One of thousands of data points you should be taking into consideration.
Here's another one. Q said: "POTUS must isolate himself to prevent negative optics."
Here's another one. Why in the world would Pelosi be so desperate to impeach Trump out of office when her team is proudly lauding that Trump will only be there another 7 days.
When there is military intervention, it cannot seem like Trump initiated it or is in control of it for the sake of optics.
All that makes sense over the next 7 days. I'm just trying to figure if it's really over if we see a public inauguration featuring Biden -- which I certainly don't want to see
No, you're not.
When your question is "When will you accept defeat? Will it be when my imaginary hypothetical happens?", the answer is shove it up your ass.
You devised a hypothetical outcome that is the complete antithesis of Q, then demanded we accept your outcome as real as we elaborate on how we'll feel when your antithesis happens.
Fuck that, DOOMER.
I never asked for how anyone will "feel", the original text is still up there.
Your rephrasing of my question into your proposed assumptions of what you think it means is totally incorrect. I am completely attempting to ascertain what is going on.
I'll say it again since your have a reading comprehension issue -- the OP is the one that said to dismiss POTUS speech yesterday as counter signal, should we apply that logic if an inauguration is broadcast in 7 days?
It's a pretty simple Q and not nefarious like you attribute.
It's all about how much brain power you can muster to crunch all the data points.
Trump's book was named "The Art of the Deal". He named it as such because he values Sun Tzu's "The Art of War". One of Sun Tzu's most famous sayings is "Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak."
One of thousands of data points you should be taking into consideration.
Here's another one. Q said: "POTUS must isolate himself to prevent negative optics."
Here's another one. Why in the world would Pelosi be so desperate to impeach Trump out of office when her team is proudly lauding that Trump will only be there another 7 days.
When there is military intervention, it cannot seem like Trump initiated it or is in control of it for the sake of optics.
All that makes sense over the next 7 days. I'm just trying to figure if it's really over if we see a public inauguration featuring Biden -- which I certainly don't want to see