They deleted the entire account, making all data unavailable in a way that IS entirely illegal. All communications of the president are considered to be official. Silicon valley dweebs can't decide to erase them. Well.. They can, but they'll pay the price for doing so.
However, you're also ignoring the fact that “no records.exist“ response for Seth rich.until, what, 2 months ago, then 20k show up?
Deleted does not, as you say, mean destroyed or unrecoverable. However, it does put up a layer of defense to pretend that the deletes weren't soft, or that snapshots.don't exist, or that there's not months of incrementals that can be restored.
They deleted the entire account, making all data unavailable in a way that IS entirely illegal. All communications of the president are considered to be official. Silicon valley dweebs can't decide to erase them. Well.. They can, but they'll pay the price for doing so.
Let’s FOIA request them.
FAFO Request please
I'm a software engineer. Nothing was deleted. Everything is still in the database.
Yes, most deletes are soft.
However, you're also ignoring the fact that “no records.exist“ response for Seth rich.until, what, 2 months ago, then 20k show up?
Deleted does not, as you say, mean destroyed or unrecoverable. However, it does put up a layer of defense to pretend that the deletes weren't soft, or that snapshots.don't exist, or that there's not months of incrementals that can be restored.
Your argument hinges on specifics and not intent.
With Seth Rich, they didn't commit a crime of destroying government records. They just lied about them existing.
Why are attempting to defend the people who had Seth rich murdered?
To amend section 2201 of title 44, United States Code, to require the preservation of Presidential social media accounts, and for other purposes.
Deleting the account and banning the president from accessing it is a violation of COVFEFE.