She believed that in the event if Biden and Harris failed to be inaugurated on 20th of January she would become acting President as Trump's and Pence's terms expire and she is the first in the line of succession after Pence. But her stolen laptop contains proofs of crimes that make her ineligible to serve as President (like giving aid to enemies of the US as per 14th amendment). So then it would be Grassley or Pompeo who become President in that scenario.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
No, I don't think you understand; We have a total of 18 Intelligence Agencies. It was 17 (kek!) up until very recently, but the Space Force now has an intel dept., bringing America's total to 18 separate & distinct Intelligence Agencies.
Old-school, physical spying & intelligence gathering is very difficult and risky.
Intercepting physical mail, stealing or accessing computers, servers, etc; that's insanely difficult and inefficient.
ALL of the intel agencies rely almost exclusively on DIGITAL / SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE: listening in on and intercepting phone calls, emails, chats, instant mesages, EVERYTHING.
They ruthlessly exploit the fact that EVERYTHING TODAY IS DIGITAL, INTERNET CONNECTED, HAS MICROPHONES, SPEAKERS, WIFI, BLUETOOTH, BUILT RIGHT IN.
The intel agencies no longer need to implant physical listening devices, intercept / steal physical mail, packages, or anything of the sort.
Example; if you are an intel agency in DC, why would you bother trying to gain physical access to the office of a target in San Diego, 3,000+ miles away? You have to physically send someone; put them on a plane, get them a place to stay & work out of, etc. That individual must take great pains to enter the target office undetected, plant a listening device, hope it works and remains undiscovered, etc.
Why do that when you can hack into the targets smart phone, or simply digitally intercept all comms emanating from that device?
Why physically plant a bug / listening device, when you could digitally access the target's ipad, laptop, or smart TV, from anywhere in the world?
You do know that virtually ALL TV's these days have internet access, speakers & microphones built in, right?
My point is; if the NSA and 18 other agencies can electronically / digitally intercept and access everything that is on any computer, cell phone, etc; why bother actually grabbing the physical devices?
I just don't understand, or maybe my understanding is all messed up.
I think you ought to re-read the article I posted above.
I agree with everything you say about gathering info, but the best way I can explain my thoughts are with the DNC Russia Hack. It has been proven it couldn’t have been a hack because of the data transfer rate, had to be a physical transfer. Because the intelligence agencies are corrupted (military is the only way) this is still not known, and Seth Rich still waits for justice. If you have the laptop it can be used directly without having to go through the agencies - who still cannot be trusted
Or maybe it’s to troll her ?
That's a very good point too.
Thank you!