She believed that in the event if Biden and Harris failed to be inaugurated on 20th of January she would become acting President as Trump's and Pence's terms expire and she is the first in the line of succession after Pence. But her stolen laptop contains proofs of crimes that make her ineligible to serve as President (like giving aid to enemies of the US as per 14th amendment). So then it would be Grassley or Pompeo who become President in that scenario.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
I'm very far from an expert on this, OK? So keep that in mind & please do double-check me on this.
Here's my understanding, kinda random & scattered as it comes to me;
Q keeps mentioning "FISA" Such as "FISA brings down the house" and making similar statements.
I always took that to mean 2 things;
Remember; this is going to be 100% military; UCMJ, court martials, military tribunals, etc. I read somewhere recently that yes; (I think in relation to laptops stolen from capitol, allegedly by good guys); yes, evidentiary standards are much looser or at least substantively different for military trials vs. civilian.
JMHO, but hopefully we can get judges & other people to say "u know, fuck warrants & shit; this is a literal act of war, treason & sedition and an active coup; we're using these tools we have at our disposals."
The left has just made shit up as they go along, for so fucking long, it's long past due for US to do it & use it against them.
Hope that helps a bit.....LOL.... :-)