Johnheretohelp with a message.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
no he is not
Prove it?
Check the date on his thread here. Did things not play out exactly like this?
https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1285607581315215363
I've gone from "how many coincidences" to "this is too many coincidences and I need to rethink the nature of coincidences". This thread blew me away and validated everything Q is saying
He isn't the only one that predicted it. Just about everyone I know expected there to be some hardcore cheating, using voting machines, "finding" ballot dumps, "losing" ballots, etc. - It's not exactly new.
The only thing that IS new is the extent to which they did it. Many many people were worried they would indeed amp it up.
All Trump supporters also know the media is an absolute clown-fest. If they cheated, it's obvious the media would cover for it.
I think the one most unique thing in all of this that not many people predicted by comparison is just how much we won and absolutely shattered their illusion of a sketchy-but-seemingly-legitimate election.
Now, I'm not saying that this guy isn't legit in any way. What I am saying is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Q has provided that over the past three years. Trump and others have provided that with election fraud. If the best proof this guy has is a decent prediction that is not particularly unique, I don't think that's enough.
Oh, I must have missed the part where Biden didn't choose a VP.
eyeroll yeah just ignore everything else. Honestly.