Crazy thought on Election Interference EO, Asset Seizure, etc.

posted 3 years ago by SvixGale 3 years ago by SvixGale +21 / -0

THIS IS JUST MY OPINION AND WILD ASS SPECULATION; I’VE GOT ZERO FACTUAL BASIS FOR THIS, IT’S JUST A “WOULDN’T IT BE NICE” DREAM OF MINE

Carefully re-read Trump’s Sept. 2018 Executive Order on Foreign Election Interference. (Link at bottom).

This EO allows (directs / orders?) the US Government to seize all assets & property from ALL people, companies, groups, organizations, etc, who have been found and determined to have interfered in our elections.

Wouldn’t it be AMAZING if Trump not only seized all the assets of obviously treasonous companies like Apple, Google and Twitter.....

What if Trump then took and redistributed their billions of dollars in cash & assets to WE, THE PEOPLE?????

I’m sure the thought has crossed his mind.... :-D

Don't take my word for it, read the full text of the EO yourself:

Executive Order #13848

Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– SvixGale [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah, my thoughts on that; I think NESARA / GESARA just sounds way too "out there" and crazy to be true or have a real high chance of happening / implementation.

That doesn't mean we can't implement bits & pieces of it, though! :-)

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Pahlyssa 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Right? We can dream!