Q Predicted POTUS impeached after 2020 election fraud? If so, the plan is still on track then?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (120)
sorted by:
No quantum computer needed. Any high functioning autist that has a mind that thinks in topology and pictures can do this. I'm one such and know what I can do, given proper data. E.g. I figured out that the CIA was secretly 'Marxist' back in 1976. I was 16.
Btw, because of my job, I know the current state of the art in quantum computing. At this timr, there is not even an appropriate "programming" model. The direction everyone is taking is going to be a dead end. I was tasked by a friend who realizes this and knows what I can do to develop a proper one. He is a core developer in the field. I am close to completing this task that he has given me. I am very doubtful that anyone would have come up with what I have. It's just too out of the box.
yeah you only had to look at the MI5-6 scandals in the UK with Kim Philby etc. being Russia double agents to figure out the scam
Rothschilds like communism
Rockefellers are more into capitalism and having it a bit messier
Thus far it seems like a two family mafia slugging match for territory - as was the Iraq war.
Topology. Our minds are the most powerful computer. I can't get into all of the math (computational model theory, etc), but a machine made by man will never surpass what has been designed and programmed by GOD. You need to read Godel. Btw, GOD has been teaching me math since I was 4.
This is all too much for my brain but, I’m so very intrigued by you.
As for topology, this is a bit hard to explain. In brief, reality has a very specific type of topology. As events unfold, there is a limited number of "paths" that history can follow. It's kind of like Ricci Flow.
Start with Kurt Gödel. Btw, he was a very strong Christian. The basic idea is that as computers become "smarter", they begin to be plagued by all of the errors that are characteristic of human cognition. A formal system can be either sufficiently complete or sufficiently accurate.