Can anyone confirm that the timestamp isn't a result of appending an earlier article, i.e. originally having it be about the rally but then shifting to the protest afterwards?
I'm asking because I think this would be an excellent red pill if it's exactly what it appears to be.
Oh, I'm not saying I buy that story. It's more so that even the existence of such an explanation renders this useless as a means of red pilling our normie friends & family.
There should be hundred and hundreds of examples of that then, right? It should be so common that we have already heard about this because people had already pointed it out about some other time-related story, like the article that called the Oscar winners before the Oscars aired or the article that called the Super Bowl Winner before the Super Bowl aired.
Can anyone confirm that the timestamp isn't a result of appending an earlier article, i.e. originally having it be about the rally but then shifting to the protest afterwards?
I'm asking because I think this would be an excellent red pill if it's exactly what it appears to be.
Oh, I'm not saying I buy that story. It's more so that even the existence of such an explanation renders this useless as a means of red pilling our normie friends & family.
Do you have the link instead of the screenshot?
There should be hundred and hundreds of examples of that then, right? It should be so common that we have already heard about this because people had already pointed it out about some other time-related story, like the article that called the Oscar winners before the Oscars aired or the article that called the Super Bowl Winner before the Super Bowl aired.