An evil movement can come out of the Jewish people without the Jewish people being evil. Bad actors are invading this movement in order to discredit it by trying to dress it in the trappings of anti-Semitism. There are certainly Jews in the upper echelon of this, and they like to hold the people they share heritage with hostage as a shield against criticism. In reality, they share nothing but blood.
We’ve known for DECADES priests were molesting children and learned that the disease went all the way to the top, BUT NO ONE IS STUPID OR IGNORANT enough to blame CATHOLICS?!?!
I think we're in agreement, here. I have Jewish blood. I have strong ties to the Jewish community. I celebrate the High Holy Days. I don't think you understood what I wrote, or maybe I'm misunderstanding your reply.
I'm saying there are people with Jewish ancestry at or near the top of this, but the Jewish community as a whole bears no responsibility for them. They're a shield the bad actors hold up to absorb the blame.
Not recognizing that means letting the vast majority of the DS off the hook with no investigation. Because while it may have started from inside (but not as a result of) Judaism, it's now mostly Gentiles.
I really appreciate your reply, you and I certainly have common ground, but I do not think we are in agreement here.
I believe it is dangerous to find a common immutable characteristic in people and identify that as having some bearing on their behavior.
People cannot and should not be reduced down to something they are either born with, or into. Doing that literally creates and justifies bias and bigotry.
It may be more difficult to examine bad people more deeply than the obvious and easy shared common traits, but it is an effort that need be made.
I have no doubt there were common links between the bad people who did bad things, but that they happened to be Jewish is an absurd reason to equate their conduct with the same. The ONLY reason to do that is to associate the bad with that common thread.
We're definitely saying exactly the same thing. I apologise for any confusion resulting from my choice of words. Let me state it more clearly: the fact that they shared Jewish blood has nothing to do with the fact that there are a number of Jews in the cabal. It has to do with the fact that the first Rothschilds, who probably were at least present at the start of all of this, would obviously be most comfortable recruiting from inside the community they were most familiar with. This has nothing to do with immutable characteristics. It has nothing to do with culture. It has to do with familiarity and human nature.
An evil movement can come out of the Jewish people without the Jewish people being evil. Bad actors are invading this movement in order to discredit it by trying to dress it in the trappings of anti-Semitism. There are certainly Jews in the upper echelon of this, and they like to hold the people they share heritage with hostage as a shield against criticism. In reality, they share nothing but blood.
WTF is wrong with all of you?
We’ve known for DECADES priests were molesting children and learned that the disease went all the way to the top, BUT NO ONE IS STUPID OR IGNORANT enough to blame CATHOLICS?!?!
This is the height of thoughtlessness.
I think we're in agreement, here. I have Jewish blood. I have strong ties to the Jewish community. I celebrate the High Holy Days. I don't think you understood what I wrote, or maybe I'm misunderstanding your reply.
I'm saying there are people with Jewish ancestry at or near the top of this, but the Jewish community as a whole bears no responsibility for them. They're a shield the bad actors hold up to absorb the blame.
Not recognizing that means letting the vast majority of the DS off the hook with no investigation. Because while it may have started from inside (but not as a result of) Judaism, it's now mostly Gentiles.
I really appreciate your reply, you and I certainly have common ground, but I do not think we are in agreement here.
I believe it is dangerous to find a common immutable characteristic in people and identify that as having some bearing on their behavior.
People cannot and should not be reduced down to something they are either born with, or into. Doing that literally creates and justifies bias and bigotry.
It may be more difficult to examine bad people more deeply than the obvious and easy shared common traits, but it is an effort that need be made.
I have no doubt there were common links between the bad people who did bad things, but that they happened to be Jewish is an absurd reason to equate their conduct with the same. The ONLY reason to do that is to associate the bad with that common thread.
Perhaps I said it better here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0gOxk4U/humanity-101/
We're definitely saying exactly the same thing. I apologise for any confusion resulting from my choice of words. Let me state it more clearly: the fact that they shared Jewish blood has nothing to do with the fact that there are a number of Jews in the cabal. It has to do with the fact that the first Rothschilds, who probably were at least present at the start of all of this, would obviously be most comfortable recruiting from inside the community they were most familiar with. This has nothing to do with immutable characteristics. It has nothing to do with culture. It has to do with familiarity and human nature.