48
posted ago by EJD2nd ago by EJD2nd +48 / -0

The MAJORITY of humans have detectable, common, coronavirus’ in their cells (not #19) but "A" coronavirus. Virus' can't be passed between species and are not airborne.


CDC’s July 13, 2020 document On page 42, in a section titled- “Performance Characteristics,” we find this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

[Means they’ve NEVER isolated a “CV-19” sample. The CDC, WHO, and their UK equal’s March statement was the event was being lowered to a SEASONAL FLU.]

If "millions" died in China, where are the millions of deaths anywhere else?

THE RT-PCR TEST

The RT-PCR tests cell samples seeking genetic sequences (bits of NON-human DNA) ‘perhaps’ matching known viral genomes, not specifically "Covid-19." The small genetic snippets must be amplified/cycles in order to become discernible.

Amplification protocol over 30x cycles is viewed unusable, unreliable, and scientifically unjustified, yet Drosten (Christian Drosten, director Institute of Virology in Berlin who developed one of the first virological screen tests for patients with SARS-CoV-2) and WHO, recommend tests set to 45 cycles.

Results will indicate the PRESENCE of "some" viral DNA (genetic material) in one's cells like cookie crumbs and not the amounts to make one ill.

"Positive" results nationwide have be found in fruit, sterile water, animals, etc. Tests may pick up dead debris or inactive viral particles posing no risk at all to the patient/others or pick up the presence of other coronaviruses. These may simply indicate past common cold recuperation, but unable to ascertain any current illness, or predict future symptoms, or even if one is contagious.

Chances are, asymptomatic, a positive test just means detection of inactive viral DNA in your body and that you’re not contagious and pose no risk to anyone.

Before his death, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, repeatedly stressed it should not be used as a diagnostic tool because it’s incapable of diagnosing disease.

It appears millions of people are being found to carry inactive viral DNA that pose no risk to anyone, yet these test results are being called “cases” and used to implement economic and social controls by causing unjustified fear.