P3s / P8s activity: potential naval interdictions in WA/FL?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Holy shit! Please, explain more of this! I feel like a kid again, sitting with my paw paw, talking about the brilliance and strategy of some of our WW2 operations!
Note: remember, any engine without a manual transmission is effectively controlled by a computer (see: fuel-injection). If the computer isn't combat hardened (i.e. against EMPs), you are dead-in-the-watter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvGfN0krZsA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR6DO2N-08Q ... longer vid, but explains why the B52 is a better platform choice vs more modern bombers for this interdiction mission.
Image of external B52 cruise missile mounts: https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1979/12/06/a-left-side-view-of-a-b-52-stratofortress-aircraft-carrying-agm-109-tomahawk-362bb4-1600.jpg
Internal rotary mount: (1979 tech) https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-hCjO43k-1Y/maxresdefault.jpg
NOTE: 8800+ mile range (without refueling) + cruse missile range of 650 miles, and many are based out of Shreveport, LA ... you pretty much only need 1 to loiter around Nebraska/Kansas, make a wide turn when the P3s / P8s confirm a boatful of Pedos trying to run, fire a pot-shot and return to station.
Have a second one on the tarmac ready so that you have 24-hr cover (2x 12hr shifts) ... or if you have a coordinated effort to make a run from both coasts at the same time, scramble the stand-by bird for brief support activity. I'd bet every time we see them both up over the past month, this is what's been happening. And every time they disappear off the transponder scope, is probably when they are getting ready to shoot.