From the doc: On February 19, 2015, World Vision again requested a license to transact with ISRA in
order to pay them $125,000 for services rendered.43 In its request, World Vision stressed that it
could face severe legal consequences and even expulsion from Sudan if it did not pay ISRA the
monies owed.44 On May 4, 2015, theObama Administration’s State Department recommended
OFAC grant World Vision’s request for a license to pay ISRA $125,000 in monies owed.45 The
following day, OFAC granted World Vision a specific license to pay ISRA $125,000 only for
services rendered.46 On May 14, 2015, OFAC sent World Vision a “Cautionary Letter” notifying
it that the transactions they engaged in with ISRA appears to have violated the Global Terrorism
Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 594, in direct opposition of U.S. law and international
sanctions.
From the doc: On February 19, 2015, World Vision again requested a license to transact with ISRA in order to pay them $125,000 for services rendered.43 In its request, World Vision stressed that it could face severe legal consequences and even expulsion from Sudan if it did not pay ISRA the monies owed.44 On May 4, 2015, the Obama Administration’s State Department recommended OFAC grant World Vision’s request for a license to pay ISRA $125,000 in monies owed. 45 The following day, OFAC granted World Vision a specific license to pay ISRA $125,000 only for services rendered.46 On May 14, 2015, OFAC sent World Vision a “Cautionary Letter” notifying it that the transactions they engaged in with ISRA appears to have violated the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 594, in direct opposition of U.S. law and international sanctions.