Idiots doing idiot things because they are idiots. Yes, Japan currently is basically land of the neko-neko lovers now, but it has always been dead set against other cultures that haven't fought them and won.
I'd like to remind all Pakistanis that when you push Japan too far, do not be surprised if they decide you will make an excellent war crime level test subject candidate. Those guys legit go ape shit. And tbh I wouldn't stop them at all.
.... I haven't read as much tripe about Burnham before those paragraphs. He was fighting against a reform uk candidate and a restore candidate, and because reform can't win shit because it's basically just as bad as Labour but farage flavoured, and not enough people know about restore to back it yet, labour won.
It wasn't an "emphatic" victory. It was a victory in a pre existing Labour seat which didn't go to restore because they can't mobilise voters to stop a more relevant, right wing party from taking their share apart. Also, since when has Labour been "center left"? It's as center left as Joseph fucking Stalin was for mother Russia!
If anyone reading that understands British politics at all, they know this was written by some brain dead left cockwomble who can discern his arse from his elbow. I've seen pigeons with more intellect.
"Brits" don't want to rejoin the EU. The BBC, media, elites, and the politicians want to rejoin the EU, and have been punishing the people for going against their desired outcome for almost 2 decades now.
The truth of the uk being in any way a part of the eu is that they never even voted on being a part of it. The pm back in 1972 just went "OK were in the common market" and never gave anyone a say.
Yeah agreed on your third point. Best we can do is average it over the time frame, but that's decades and creates a massive math problem conceptually. The start of the scandal goes all the way back to the 1950s, so that's well over 70 years of fuckery.
Given this there are multiple complications that both hinder and help the numbers:
- First, the further you go back, the fewer Muslims are in the country.
- Secondly, the numbers of kids around is also likely less as the total pop was lower. So the denominators shift massively (based on ai it drops by half). It also didn't really get much bigger and is static for decades.
- Thirdly, the victims were in many cases used as breeding farms to keep the trafficking rings well stocked with further victims. This muddled numbers further
- Fourthly, the 250k number is in of itself an extrapolation. It is a minimum estimate and likely is higher due to the underreporting of data across the years.
- Fifthly, there will be victims who span multiple periods, and we don't know when their abuse ever stopped happening. I doubt there's some 80 yr old granny getting abused by a 100 year old Muslim man, obviously, but from 10 to 30 years old? More than possible in my view.
I asked ai to give me a table for demographics:
Decadal Estimates of Girls Aged 10–16
- 1950s: 2.4 – 2.6 million Emergence: Reports cite isolated networks forming; abuse patterns begin.
- 1960s: 2.7 – 2.9 million. Expansion period: Networks reportedly solidify in industrial towns; limited public awareness.
- 1970s: 3.0 – 3.2 million. Entrenchment Period: Abuse becomes more organized in care systems; first known reports ignored.
- 1980s: 2.8 – 3.0 million. Silence & Cover up period: Victims frequently disbelieved; "grooming" term not yet in public lexicon.
- 1990s: 2.6 – 2.8 million Intensification period: Major rings active (e.g., Rotherham starts ~1997); exploitation models refine.
- 2000s: 2.5 – 2.7 million Peak Exposure Period: First major convictions (2010); media investigations begin (e.g., Andrew Norfolk).
- 2010s: 2.4 – 2.6 million. Scandal Breaking Period: Jay Report (2014) reveals 1,400+ victims in Rotherham alone; national inquiries launch.
- 2020s: 2.3 – 2.5 million Present Period: Operation Stovewood continues; new convictions secured through 2025/2026.
If we average it out it's probable about 2.5m per decade, so at some point we are looking at most of the female population at that point. Even then, it's about 0.7% to 1% of the population affected, and in some periods it's far greater a proportion (especially in the 80s and 90s).
So given the vast variances across time and propensity of crimes, and the fact my numbers were too low before for the current census data, I still would say 1 in 20 is probably a safe bet.
the evidence is now overwhelming and irrefutable. The Rape gangs did not operate in the shadows, but with the active or passive consent of the British state. The betrayal was total.
That is the final conclusion made by the inquiry report. And as damning a statement as that is, it is only a summary of the gross negligence, complicit actions, and heinous crimes committed.
In addition, the conclusion states:
- AT LEAST 250,000 victims were trafficked, groomed, and raped by these gangs. That's the minimum expected numbers here, it could be (and probably was) higher.
- as i mentioned in another post, once you factor in demographics to British girls under 16, that equates to 5% or in other words a 1 in 20 chance a British girl was raped.
- the propensity of the criminals involved in these gangs to be Muslim was tracked to be approximately 90%, and contrasts with Britain's demographic declarations of 6% for this religious group. That is a representation index of 1500, meaning that for a crime like this is 14x more likely to be done. By a Muslim than a random individual (calc: (100*0.9/.06)=1500 - 100 index (normal index) /100 for the rate).
- the police, social services, the NHS, courts, and media are all in part complicit in these events. Police officers participating in the crime; courts handing down warnings or very lenient sentences; the NHS letting the offenders collect their victims from the hospital;social services ignoring the complaints; and media pretending this problem isn't a problem at all, but just a "far right conspiracy".
This is also just the tip of the iceberg. The problem is bad enough, but the specifics are so horrific that I felt physically ill from reading them. Murders, abuse and death of babies caused by the rapes themselves, stuff that would make the Maquis de Sade say "whoa steady on, my boy!"
The people who did this I can no longer consider as human beings in my eyes anymore, nor the people who let it happen under their watch. It is why I refuse to stay here longer than I must, and categorically will never raise a child in this hell hole of a country. I'd say a pox on this nation, but it's already here.
I get what you are trying to say, but you aren't quite looking at the problem right. Sure it's 0.3% of total population but:
- you've ignore age demographics: 12.7 million under 16s
- you've ignored gender demographics: we don't have accurate counts for this in the age group, but 50.73% are females in the uk, so extrapolating from there, you can presume about 6. 3 million girls under 16.
- you've ignored racial demographics: again no real number for the age group, but about 76.8% are white British in the uk, so we can estimate there are 5 million white British girls under 16.
Now when you compare that 5 mil relevant figure to the victims, you get 5% of the relevant group being tortured/taped by these gangs. That's a 1 in 20 chance someone's daughter was a victim of this. A 1 in 20 chance some paki is gonna rape a young girl because "her skirt was too short" or "that ma'am haram and kaffir, so she's free game."
So yeah... The numbers in real terms and relative stats are the important way of looking at the problem. That also doesn't factor in a few other risk elements, but it's bad enough.
Okay so yes, this is unsourced data, BUT:
Those are the data points that align with both time and events. However, there is no current evidence that Surrey Police ever investigated epstein uk network in 2009. Operative word there is current. If this claim is proven to be true on the 9th of July, then all data points will align.