The duality of the choice you are putting before us, is a clear indication that you have mentally fallen into the trap of the classical Greek dichotomy.
"have to accept Q was wrong".
Why is it something we have to accept? In effect you are already pointing to the negation of your dichotomy by writing about the sheer size of the movement, the cohesiveness, and the sense of patriotism.
This is what Q's ultimate goal was. Q said so himself. Our goal is to be knowledgeable and able to comfort each other and others.
Especially listen to around minute 4, though in actuality, each word spoken is exactly on the mark. Note the switch in pronouns.
Then we get Q.
Consider what the founding fathers wrote about the 2nd amendment. Especially, the phrase : necessary for a free State. ....
If power is to be returned to the people, then by definition, we all have to return to a state of freedom. Not a geographical location, but a way of life.
And only a freeman will carry and bear arms of his own volition. Note the word arms. You can hold your wife, your kids, perform chores and work, earn a living, pray, but, you can also do something else. Prohibiting arms is like cutting of both your own arms, as the basic idea of arms is joint together. Infringing on this particular right, is pushing it to the fringes, diminishing it. Not your 1st, 4th, 3rd amendment is the most important. The 2nd. All the others flow from it.
If not, Enslavement ensues. So, by definition, a state of freedom goes hand in hand with arms in the hands of the body of the people.
We are awaking to the schemes and methods of the enemies of freedom, through the legislative process, the graft and abuse employed while executing laws. We are awakening to how far our own enslavement has progressed.
But we need to understand dark and light. Just care and action and wrong care and action. It is not just pedos. It is the abrogation of our own responsibility that allows evil, allows darkness to exist.
It is why Q posted about our clothing, our battle dress.
Most importantly, no is a word we have heard most during our upbringing, but have lost, since then, the awareness of its power. And although it is a negative, it is a negative to evil, to darkness. It is a no to support a system that manifests evil.
This transition needs time. And whether Trump comes through or not, is not the issue. The issue is, do we care enough, and can we help others to care enough. Once this care spreads more, the right action will follow commensurate with the threat to be opposed.
And considering the spread and care .... That genie has de-bottled and is unstoppable
Maintaining we have to admit Q to be wrong, is ascribing a level of infallibility that only one person is able to claim. And that is neither Trump nor Q.
This said: all this is premature, as the fat lady has not sung. This is not a time for what if this, or what if that ...
This is a time of prayer, of trust, of peace, of comfort, of strength, not fragility and doubt.
Because, the storm will also be upon us. And the ensuing battle for our freedoms, will be opposed by means employed in a way you have not yet seen be brought to bear.
See: confessions of an economic hitman as an example.
Understand: this election was their last opportunity. Right now, is their window of opportunity to hammer in the final nails to the coffin. We represent a mortal threat.
The duality of the choice you are putting before us, is a clear indication that you have mentally fallen into the trap of the classical Greek dichotomy.
"have to accept Q was wrong".
Why is it something we have to accept? In effect you are already pointing to the negation of your dichotomy by writing about the sheer size of the movement, the cohesiveness, and the sense of patriotism.
This is what Q's ultimate goal was. Q said so himself. Our goal is to be knowledgeable and able to comfort each other and others.
Listen to what Trump said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
Especially listen to around minute 4, though in actuality, each word spoken is exactly on the mark. Note the switch in pronouns.
Then we get Q.
Consider what the founding fathers wrote about the 2nd amendment. Especially, the phrase : necessary for a free State. ....
If power is to be returned to the people, then by definition, we all have to return to a state of freedom. Not a geographical location, but a way of life.
And only a freeman will carry and bear arms of his own volition. Note the word arms. You can hold your wife, your kids, perform chores and work, earn a living, pray, but, you can also do something else. Prohibiting arms is like cutting of both your own arms, as the basic idea of arms is joint together. Infringing on this particular right, is pushing it to the fringes, diminishing it. Not your 1st, 4th, 3rd amendment is the most important. The 2nd. All the others flow from it.
If not, Enslavement ensues. So, by definition, a state of freedom goes hand in hand with arms in the hands of the body of the people.
We are awaking to the schemes and methods of the enemies of freedom, through the legislative process, the graft and abuse employed while executing laws. We are awakening to how far our own enslavement has progressed.
But we need to understand dark and light. Just care and action and wrong care and action. It is not just pedos. It is the abrogation of our own responsibility that allows evil, allows darkness to exist.
It is why Q posted about our clothing, our battle dress.
Most importantly, no is a word we have heard most during our upbringing, but have lost, since then, the awareness of its power. And although it is a negative, it is a negative to evil, to darkness. It is a no to support a system that manifests evil.
This transition needs time. And whether Trump comes through or not, is not the issue. The issue is, do we care enough, and can we help others to care enough. Once this care spreads more, the right action will follow commensurate with the threat to be opposed.
And considering the spread and care .... That genie has de-bottled and is unstoppable
Maintaining we have to admit Q to be wrong, is ascribing a level of infallibility that only one person is able to claim. And that is neither Trump nor Q.
This said: all this is premature, as the fat lady has not sung. This is not a time for what if this, or what if that ...
This is a time of prayer, of trust, of peace, of comfort, of strength, not fragility and doubt.
Because, the storm will also be upon us. And the ensuing battle for our freedoms, will be opposed by means employed in a way you have not yet seen be brought to bear.
See: confessions of an economic hitman as an example.
Understand: this election was their last opportunity. Right now, is their window of opportunity to hammer in the final nails to the coffin. We represent a mortal threat.
But they already have lost. We did not cower.