I am truly sorry for what you have had to go through.
But that is the civil justice system. Military tribunals are completely different. Facts, evidence presented, reviewed. Judgement delivered. No lawyerly tap dances or theatrics. A case that might take two years in civil court can be handled via a tribunal in a week or so.
The nuremberg trials were conducted according to the shared legal principles of the authorities that presided.
In the USA, to be tried in a military tribunal, you must first be declared an enemy of the state, which strips you of your fundamental rights. The precedent for this was set during the trial of Johnson v. Eisentrager, known as the "Eisentraitor" case, notably referenced at the confirmation hearing for Justice Kavanaugh.
I am not a lawyer, but that is how I understand it.
I am truly sorry for what you have had to go through.
But that is the civil justice system. Military tribunals are completely different. Facts, evidence presented, reviewed. Judgement delivered. No lawyerly tap dances or theatrics. A case that might take two years in civil court can be handled via a tribunal in a week or so.
The nuremberg trials were conducted according to the shared legal principles of the authorities that presided.
In the USA, to be tried in a military tribunal, you must first be declared an enemy of the state, which strips you of your fundamental rights. The precedent for this was set during the trial of Johnson v. Eisentrager, known as the "Eisentraitor" case, notably referenced at the confirmation hearing for Justice Kavanaugh.
I am not a lawyer, but that is how I understand it.
Correct. Which means that anyone who participated or aided in election fraud can be considered an enemy combatant and tried accordingly.