we have been completely deceived about WWII and history in general. You probably know that by now. I think there were only 17 convictions. Many were sent to Russian gulags. Many were allowed to flee to Argentina.
No disrespect, it doesn't seem like it you have had to deal with a criminal justice system. It took 18 months an a threat from a judge to get the person that hurt my daughter to take his deal. She was prepared to testify, but the judge saw the evidence, she was under the age of consent and had another under 18 girl pregnant. It took EIGHTEEN months, DNA, witnesses, etc.
I am truly sorry for what you have had to go through.
But that is the civil justice system. Military tribunals are completely different. Facts, evidence presented, reviewed. Judgement delivered. No lawyerly tap dances or theatrics. A case that might take two years in civil court can be handled via a tribunal in a week or so.
The nuremberg trials were conducted according to the shared legal principles of the authorities that presided.
In the USA, to be tried in a military tribunal, you must first be declared an enemy of the state, which strips you of your fundamental rights. The precedent for this was set during the trial of Johnson v. Eisentrager, known as the "Eisentraitor" case, notably referenced at the confirmation hearing for Justice Kavanaugh.
I am not a lawyer, but that is how I understand it.
we have been completely deceived about WWII and history in general. You probably know that by now. I think there were only 17 convictions. Many were sent to Russian gulags. Many were allowed to flee to Argentina.
Long but worth it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/mZpeJkSNjcA3/
No disrespect, it doesn't seem like it you have had to deal with a criminal justice system. It took 18 months an a threat from a judge to get the person that hurt my daughter to take his deal. She was prepared to testify, but the judge saw the evidence, she was under the age of consent and had another under 18 girl pregnant. It took EIGHTEEN months, DNA, witnesses, etc.
I am truly sorry for what you have had to go through.
But that is the civil justice system. Military tribunals are completely different. Facts, evidence presented, reviewed. Judgement delivered. No lawyerly tap dances or theatrics. A case that might take two years in civil court can be handled via a tribunal in a week or so.
The nuremberg trials were conducted according to the shared legal principles of the authorities that presided.
In the USA, to be tried in a military tribunal, you must first be declared an enemy of the state, which strips you of your fundamental rights. The precedent for this was set during the trial of Johnson v. Eisentrager, known as the "Eisentraitor" case, notably referenced at the confirmation hearing for Justice Kavanaugh.
I am not a lawyer, but that is how I understand it.
Correct. Which means that anyone who participated or aided in election fraud can be considered an enemy combatant and tried accordingly.
Military vs Civilian trials. BIG difference
Unless... these people have already had their trials and they all have a sentencing date of Jan 19... and they are sentenced enmasse.
Good for you for reading up. That was a significant historical time, to be sure.
I don't know how many parallels we can draw to what's happening now... This seems to be a totally unique situation in history.
Time will tell.