So if he was coerced into not prosecuting, then he could be seen as "innocent" during prosecution later & can be a potential witness to the goings on at the DOJ while also speeding up the process toward military intervention?
Sort of like Pence's "ceremonial role" in the certification in congress...
Another actor in the Political Theatre?
Not sure if a good one or a bad one... Good ones are convincing, yes? Bad ones are not.
If he was a bad guy trying to act good, he was a bad actor.
If he was a good guy trying to act bad, he was a good actor.
So a good actor? Or a bad actor?
Did Q say something about whitehats being good actors or was that other people's speculation?
Not sure what Barr has done that is beneficial & not implying one thing or the other, here; just speculating.
Interesting.
So if he was coerced into not prosecuting, then he could be seen as "innocent" during prosecution later & can be a potential witness to the goings on at the DOJ while also speeding up the process toward military intervention?
Sort of like Pence's "ceremonial role" in the certification in congress...
Another actor in the Political Theatre?
Not sure if a good one or a bad one... Good ones are convincing, yes? Bad ones are not.
If he was a bad guy trying to act good, he was a bad actor. If he was a good guy trying to act bad, he was a good actor.
So a good actor? Or a bad actor?
Did Q say something about whitehats being good actors or was that other people's speculation?
Not sure what Barr has done that is beneficial & not implying one thing or the other, here; just speculating.