A big question I've had since I learned about Q is how all of us that are invested in it can operate as a unit. Coordination is a good way to figure out something as complex as Q.
I was wondering what everyone's professional or semi-professional background is and how they use that in their research. For example, I am (Was. Got laid off) logistics coordinator so I look at the Q posts from that angle.
Obviously you don't have to be super specific but what do you guys do and how does that effect your experience with Q? I'd like to make a list of each user and their specialty and coordinate a Q group on Telegram or some other sight for communications.
There's still a lot of unanswered questions and details in the Q-Drops. That's before adding in things like Deltas, the Q-Clock and the whole movie poster thing. If the detective novel is good most readers try to solve the crime as they read the book or watch the movie. Ya dig?
And how do we know is at some point you won't be forced to change your mind? Even you don't know that. Appreciate idea but it's a strong no from me.
I just don't know how we make any head way if there isn't a coordinated effort to figure things out. I mean there's the forum and the Drop archives but if anyone's onto something in their research how do they know it's right. How do we know they're on the right track?