Even if I wanted to dismiss Q as a LARP, it’s not that easy given the Q Proofs. Just saying the word “LARP” isn’t actually an argument. Debunk the proofs. Provide some explanation for how all of those proofs would be possible by a guy sitting in his basement. If you say Q was making random guesses and he just happened to get lucky a few times, then that means you haven’t actually looked into or understood the proofs. I understand there are people highly committed to getting us to abandon Q and Trump, but your whole argument is just ad hominem and appeal to authority - both logical fallacies - and those aren’t persuasive. Explain the proofs! Go through them and show us how the LARP did that one, then the next one, then the next one. You know why no one has done this, and instead keeps using ad hominem and appeal to authority to make their argument? Because as soon as they sat down and attempted to really debunk the proofs, they know they would immediately look foolish. So they just dismiss them all with a wave of the hand. They are all just “confirmation bias” and “lucky guesses”. For anyone not familiar with the proofs, that might be convincing, but for us? No. We would need an actual explanation.