I could be retarded, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if I am. But wouldn't astronomically low odds of it being a coincidence suggest that you think it's more likely a coincidence than it actually being something important?
No lol. Sorry for the misunderstanding. By astronomically low chances of it being a coincidence I mean very very very low chances of it being a coincidence.
You're not retarded. You just sent me down a rabbit hole of Googling grammar online.
So, astronomical without the low added would default to a very very high value. I've used, heard, and found online the usage of astronomically low to denote a very small quantity. With astronomical acting as a modifier to low, it'd be like saying enormously low. But, apparently, that's improper -- the proper word choice would be infinitesimal. So, thanks to you I learned a new thing today, and I learned that I (and others) have been using the phrase improperly for a long time. That's embarrassing.
Not hating on ya; the past few weeks has been like drinking from Niagara Falls, there's so much info; it's easy to get confused & take stuff out of context, no matter how sharp you are.
"that the odds of it being a coincidence are astronomically low."
Yeah, as in, it's virtually certain that Trump's farewell speech was intentionally linked to #1947.
Again, how is that dooming? Because I'm saying it's 99.9 ... 9 percent certain instead if 100 percent certain? What?
I could be retarded, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if I am. But wouldn't astronomically low odds of it being a coincidence suggest that you think it's more likely a coincidence than it actually being something important?
No lol. Sorry for the misunderstanding. By astronomically low chances of it being a coincidence I mean very very very low chances of it being a coincidence.
You're not retarded. You just sent me down a rabbit hole of Googling grammar online.
So, astronomical without the low added would default to a very very high value. I've used, heard, and found online the usage of astronomically low to denote a very small quantity. With astronomical acting as a modifier to low, it'd be like saying enormously low. But, apparently, that's improper -- the proper word choice would be infinitesimal. So, thanks to you I learned a new thing today, and I learned that I (and others) have been using the phrase improperly for a long time. That's embarrassing.
I'm glad I could help sir. And even more glad that we're on the same page.
you didn't need to apologize to him: he's clearly retarded.
Bro, go grab another cup of covfefe.
Your brain isn't working right.
He's not dooming.
Not hating on ya; the past few weeks has been like drinking from Niagara Falls, there's so much info; it's easy to get confused & take stuff out of context, no matter how sharp you are.
u/orlando_pede is NOT dooming; he's awesome.
?
holy shit you are literally retarded. Low chance of coincidence = deliberate ffs
Kindly read our thread to conclusion you dimwit.