I believe that was the 1st decision date of the PA supreme court which ruled against the president.
The article 2 challenge appears to be pretty straightforward and it's a challenge that can be made against 3 or 4 states, I forget. The Governor and/or SOS can not change the state election law(s) without consent of the legislature. By doing so, they impacted the outcome of the election. If this challenge is upheld by SCOTUS (and it really should be), it could result in those electors being thrown out and resulting in Biden getting less than 270 electors. That would result in a contingent election. Of course now that we've all seen how the majority of GOP threw Trump under the bus, I'm not sure we could count on them to vote for Trump. So I don't see this as a likely avenue to overturn the election, although it would be under normal circumstances.
I believe that was the 1st decision date of the PA supreme court which ruled against the president. The article 2 challenge appears to be pretty straightforward and it's a challenge that can be made against 3 or 4 states, I forget. The Governor and/or SOS can not change the state election law(s) without consent of the legislature. By doing so, they impacted the outcome of the election. If this challenge is upheld by SCOTUS (and it really should be), it could result in those electors being thrown out and resulting in Biden getting less than 270 electors. That would result in a contingent election. Of course now that we've all seen how the majority of GOP threw Trump under the bus, I'm not sure we could count on them to vote for Trump. So I don't see this as a likely avenue to overturn the election, although it would be under normal circumstances.