If military have seen PROOF that Biden was fraudulently elected/is guilty of treason/is a pedophile, they cannot recognize him as the lawful president.
Since Trump, even thought he was the rightful winner, was not certified by Congress, they also cannot recognize him as the lawful president.
If the Corporation of the United STates has no LAWFUL president by midnight, it automatically dissolves.
COULD THIS HAVE BEEN THE PLAN ALL ALONG?
So FEMA takes over at midnight and operates according to their oath of allegience to the Constitution. And with the Corp of the US dissolved, we return to our ORIGINAL constitution, prior to the illegal Act of 1871, and reclaim our sovereign status and declare DC to be an enemy occupation.
The military then handles arrests, tribunals, and new elections. Trump had to step aside so that he would NOT be a party to any of this action. Purely military response to an attempted coup/insurrection.
After all the tribunals are over, we have elections to replace 95% of our govt who took extended vacays at GITMO. Trump, who was the legitimate winner of the pres race (and there is proof that he won BIGLY), is inaugurated on March 4 as the 19th president of the Restored Republic.
Do I have proof? No. It's a military op. We aren't meant to KNOW what's going on. But after reading exhaustive accounts of the Act of 1871 and watching hours of brain melting explanations of how our republic was hijacked by a shadow government who enacted illegal amendments to enslave us to the central banks and the IRS, and listening to several highly illuminating and logical discussions of this subject in multiple Bards FM vids on YT, this makes the most logical sense. To me, anyway.
Check it out or write it off -- your choice.
All I know is Trump did NOT concede, and he would NEVER give up without
a) letting us know; and b) moving to another galaxy
because he knows the DS want his head on a platter. This was always a fight to the death, and we can't forget that.
Until he tells me otherwise, I remain loyal to Trump and I am keeping the faith! I'm ready to see the PAIN COME DOWN like I know it will!!
its pretty simple:
not a single attorney (lin, powell, giuiliani, etc, or lesser known attorneys) went in front of a judge and swore in front of a judge at the risk of their ability to practice law they had evidence of fraud.
not. a. single. attorney. risked. their. job. to. claim. this.
the guys selling ad-space on their podcast or blog kept moving the goal posts.
trump went to arizona, flew into john mccain airport, took john mccain boulevard to a place where mccain launched his presidential election and talked shit about mccain as a draft dodger. some people liked it...but more...
i'm in arizona. 2016 there were 31 trump signs on my street. 2020, there was also 23 signs, but now they were all in one guys gravel yard.
The courts refused to hear the lawyers present evidence. We saw votes switch live. We know there was rampant fraud. We liked what Trump did. People were happy those 3 years before COVID. We know what happened. Denying that there was fraud is just putting your fingers in your ears. A casual look at the data reveals that what happened cannot be natural. They refused to audit the ballots properly. If no fraud, why refuse? Since they refused to hear the evidence, and refused to audit, and constantly interfered with attempts to investigate the fraud, Biden's presidency will remain an illegitimate coup. He'd better not attempt to interfere in our rights.
Everytime Guiliani and Jenna went to court the judge asked "is this a fraud case?" and everytime they said no. They said "no your honor." or "we are not here today alleging fraud."
EVERY. TIME.
You saw an intermediary reporting agency that predicts votecounts make corrections live, which were not certified at any point as being official. Those weren't votes, those were preliminary guesses which always switch.
I have looked hard for a trump attorney alleging fraud in court when they file their motions and there are none. They instead say "irregularities" which are not fraud. There is zero evidence irregularities (someone with a similar name as someone, someone who moved) effect even .0005 percent of a vote.
What they argued for was chain of custody or to interpret statuatory definitions of custody different to say "XYZ VOTES ARE INELIGIBLE" not that they were cast fraudulently but that the state fucked up and was obligated to throw them out despite the voter being real, legal, and cast legally at the time. Judge's were not willing to do that because they view it as disenfranchisement.
Those are fringe positions and no reputable high level mathematician is endorsing those methodologies for a reason. You can prove anything with "synthetic calculus." Particularly if your audience doesn't have a background or expertise in maths.
If fraud, why not allege in court? Again, the courts can't move to investigate something that isn't alleged before them.
The attorneys did not claim or present evidence of fraud. they alleged, in court, something different then went out of the court or onto twitter and alleged fraud, but not when they could get disbarred for lying.