If military have seen PROOF that Biden was fraudulently elected/is guilty of treason/is a pedophile, they cannot recognize him as the lawful president.
Since Trump, even thought he was the rightful winner, was not certified by Congress, they also cannot recognize him as the lawful president.
If the Corporation of the United STates has no LAWFUL president by midnight, it automatically dissolves.
COULD THIS HAVE BEEN THE PLAN ALL ALONG?
So FEMA takes over at midnight and operates according to their oath of allegience to the Constitution. And with the Corp of the US dissolved, we return to our ORIGINAL constitution, prior to the illegal Act of 1871, and reclaim our sovereign status and declare DC to be an enemy occupation.
The military then handles arrests, tribunals, and new elections. Trump had to step aside so that he would NOT be a party to any of this action. Purely military response to an attempted coup/insurrection.
After all the tribunals are over, we have elections to replace 95% of our govt who took extended vacays at GITMO. Trump, who was the legitimate winner of the pres race (and there is proof that he won BIGLY), is inaugurated on March 4 as the 19th president of the Restored Republic.
Do I have proof? No. It's a military op. We aren't meant to KNOW what's going on. But after reading exhaustive accounts of the Act of 1871 and watching hours of brain melting explanations of how our republic was hijacked by a shadow government who enacted illegal amendments to enslave us to the central banks and the IRS, and listening to several highly illuminating and logical discussions of this subject in multiple Bards FM vids on YT, this makes the most logical sense. To me, anyway.
Check it out or write it off -- your choice.
All I know is Trump did NOT concede, and he would NEVER give up without
a) letting us know; and b) moving to another galaxy
because he knows the DS want his head on a platter. This was always a fight to the death, and we can't forget that.
Until he tells me otherwise, I remain loyal to Trump and I am keeping the faith! I'm ready to see the PAIN COME DOWN like I know it will!!
Since you mention the Constitution you should really bone up on Stafford Act. I simply refuse by now to spell things out and put them here in simple terms, been doing that for the past week insisting people ACTUALLY READ the Constitution they always refer to and am met with utter silence in response. Stafford Act is rather short, won't take you much time. You should also ask your friendly fake prophet X22, or whoever else, to read it as well. At least once.
SAUCE. From the Constitution when you reply to me. I am done with utter BS presented as "But X22 says so!". Or whoever else it is. SAUCE, PLEASE.
Oh, and BTW, when refer to it, at least make an effort, it should be written as Constitution. Capital C. Have some respect for it.
Its been a long and very tiring day, but I am done listening to fake prophets.
WOW!! look at you go, spicy SAUCE!!! (Lower case to indicate a lack of respect)
Do you feel better, now?
Your entire melt down was based on my minor reference to the Constitution? Bypassing my reference to The Law of War Manual Chapter 11? Looks as if I am not the only one needing to do some reading.
So, same as all others with "I heard it from my neighbor's sister's boyfriend's aunt's nail girl who heard it from...." brigade. And pretty much known up front judging by your writing, hmmm..., style. Cannot quote anything in the Constitution to support the claim, and most likely have never even read it. Pathetic. And projecting, typical libtard behavior. Keep acting indignant, Pelosi does that every day, seems like your role model.
And that "11.3" supposed reference to the DoD manual, is still a SUPPOSED one last time I checked. You don't know, and neither does anyone else claiming it, save for Q.
Sauce, or it didn't happen.
Bahahahaha!!! Aw ~ look at you use all those big words!!! Good on ya. Since, clearly, you have to be the smartest person in the room... uh forum. Pray tell, where in the Stafford Act does it say FEMA has the authority to remove a sitting President? OR Arrest Congress for treason while in session? (article which one? You marginalize the circumstances.