1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they said he flew "with Epstein", that is accurate.

He flew with Mark Epstein.

e - I didn't find anywhere in the link that supports what is claimed in the headline.

2
aquasmurf 2 points ago +2 / -0

You seem to be okay with low effort, low quality headlines shitting all over your GAW experience. That's okay to feel that way.

It's also okay to say fuck that.

3
aquasmurf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Accurate, descriptive titles are very important.

To build on that, we should be actively reporting editorialized headlines that are not accurate, descriptive titles.

1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes yes let the butt hurt of being dead ass fucking wrong flow through you xD

1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

... but they're verbs.

10
aquasmurf 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just to save you people time, nowhere in any of this will you find Hillary actually saying what's in the editorialized headline.

2
aquasmurf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just go to that site hosting frazzled.rip - piece of cake!

8
aquasmurf 8 points ago +8 / -0

Guess what? The burden of proof is on you. And you're here begging people to find it for you because you can't find it for a reason. lol

But I'm the one full of shit. Okay.

1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Case in point about the hearsay element. See, this started as an email but now it was after a debate.

A "WE'RE ALL GOING TO HANG FROM NOOSES" JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

7
aquasmurf 7 points ago +8 / -1

lol No you didn't. You have convinced yourself that you did.

But, you didn't. It has always. been. hearsay.

16
aquasmurf 16 points ago +16 / -0

It has always been hearsay. There never was a clip or link.

1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was it chastizing? Or did we treat each other equally there?

I don't see how just messing up one plane vs. the other is grounds for any sort of suit unless they explicitly claimed nefarious activities with. There's a lot of legal leeway with broad, general implications. If you want more than that, go to a lawyer, not the internet.

6
aquasmurf 6 points ago +6 / -0

... that depends on what the defintion of 'island' is ...

28
aquasmurf 28 points ago +28 / -0

LARPing their demented fantasies on social media because they're too much of cowards to do what they're claiming they're doing.

3
aquasmurf 3 points ago +3 / -0

If what you say is true

It is. Literally two different planes/tail numbers.

Please provide the exact context/statement by The Sun that you're asking about. Thanks.

1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but if his message is wrong, he is in it for the wrong reasons so fuck him at that point.

mans needs to fact check before writin' barz, ya heard?

1
aquasmurf 1 point ago +1 / -0

what if you're wrong

I'm okay being wrong. We're sharing opinions and ideas, right?

I raised an eyebrow at the Pegasus thing and the Wood/Flynn call made me favor Wood more and Flynn less. But, I'm not coming to any conclusions based on it. To me, it seems like theater. So I'm not getting carried away with what-ifs.

0
aquasmurf 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you feel all conflict is genuine or can you subscribe to the train of thought that conflict could be manufactured?

view more: Next ›