People who do not understand Q focus on all the wrong things. They focus on predictions, but predictions are not what made Q interesting. What makes Q interesting is the big picture view he provides of geopolitics and domestic events, and the way he puts together a lot of the pieces of the puzzle for us, or at least points us in what appears to be the right direction.

Skeptics also focus on the satanic pedophiles. But Q barely talks about that stuff. I won’t say he doesn’t, but most of it is research links about child trafficking and Hollywood sex cults. He then mentions that many of these people are satanists. The corporate media feels threatened and tries to defend itself against these accusations by presenting them as absurd. But normies aren’t buying it. Even normies who reject conspiracy theories, if you tell them about the shit on Epstein Island, they believe it. Everyone knows what rich and disgusting hedonistic perverts these people are. It’s all over everything they produce. Normies have seen this for themselves. So Hollywood’s gaslighting isn’t working as well as they think it is.

What the Q skeptics should concentrate on are 1) The overall big picture Q presents, and what part of it they find so incorrect, 2) The Q Proofs, and how these coordinated winks between Q and Trump could possibly be a coincidence, and 3) The actual Q posts themselves - not outside interpretations, but the actual text of the posts themselves.

Notice too that these three things are also what the corporate media refuses to report on. They will not provide their audience with an accurate reading of Q’s narrative, they will not address any of the proofs, and they will never link to or quote Q’s actual posts, or will do so in a very limited fashion. So they are essentially being dishonest and not even reporting on the story accurately.

I don’t think anyone here actually gives a fuck if someone is skeptical of Q. Many of us are probably naturally skeptical ourselves, so we aren’t threatened by Q skeptics. What we are is frustrated that the skeptics refuse to even be honest about Q. It’s like trying to have an honest conversation about Trump with someone who refuses to admit Trump never called Neo-Nazis “very fine people”.

Oh, there is also a bit of a false narrative out there that Q just writes a bunch of cryptic nonsense that could be interpreted any way people want. While it is true that some of Q’s posts are very cryptic, the majority of them are pretty straight forward, once you understand the abbreviations and nicknames. For example, some of Q’s long posts on the China Virus strategy. Very straight forward. Also, the less straight forward posts are written with such authority and confidence that it just doesn’t feel like nonsense. The Red 1-6 posts are a good example of this. If those were just nonsense, I don’t think we would have seen the confirmations we’ve seen, but even before those confirmations, the post still had an authority about it that gave it credibility.

But most Q skeptics don’t really acknowledge the holes in the LARP theory. Like the most obvious, when has there been another three-year LARP? If it is so easy to do this, why haven’t dozens of people done this? People just pretend that three-year LARPS with millions of followers around the world and million-dollar coordinated smear campaigns by the entire corporate media are commonplace.