I was always in conflict with our oath and thought it was strange. It makes swear that will protect the constitution against enemies foreign and domestic while also making us swear that we will obey the orders of those appointed over us. Well what if the orders of those appointed over us go against the Constitition?

Little did I know there is an original oath that doesn't carry the oath to obey the orders of those appointed over us. That being said, the marshal deputies oath video shows them using the latter not the former, which gives me some hope. But remains to be seen. You can definitely expect our military to obey orders, but I do believe our officers wouldn't carry unconstitutional orders. My COs were all pretty good and decent people. That's just from personal experience.