The problem is that Trump's twitter account was removed so it's hard to verify. Maybe the internet archive? But I agree, this would be very compelling.
I didn't see the book. I saw the Q Research, qproofs.com links, and duckduckgo'd a few other things, but wasn't ultimately impressed. I'll take a look at the proof books. Thanks.
This is what I used to understand the whole and sum of Q posts. You may find it helpful. I did not put this together and take no credit for this. If you take the time to read from top to bottom and look into the referenced research and provided by Anons the whole picture starts to be come clear.
Yes, but it takes time to convert a normie to a qtard. Normies are more likely to consume images and very short written proofs than they are to consume a 2 hour long video proving veracity (which was great btw).
The problem is that Trump's twitter account was removed so it's hard to verify. Maybe the internet archive? But I agree, this would be very compelling.
http://trumptwitterarchive.com/
I was hoping for screenshots that tied the 0 delta Q posts with screenshots of the equivalent Trump tweet. One can have dreams I suppose.
There's a Q Proof book in the sidebar, did you check that?
Oh wait. I did check out the book v1.3, but it's pretty difficult to consume. Maybe I'm a retard. Or maybe I'm not retarded enough ?
LOL
I didn't see the book. I saw the Q Research, qproofs.com links, and duckduckgo'd a few other things, but wasn't ultimately impressed. I'll take a look at the proof books. Thanks.
Try this. This was pretty convincing. https://vimeo.com/451318920
This
This is what I used to understand the whole and sum of Q posts. You may find it helpful. I did not put this together and take no credit for this. If you take the time to read from top to bottom and look into the referenced research and provided by Anons the whole picture starts to be come clear.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g/edit#gid=1596710080
Thank you
Yes, but it takes time to convert a normie to a qtard. Normies are more likely to consume images and very short written proofs than they are to consume a 2 hour long video proving veracity (which was great btw).
Oh wait. I did check out the book v1.3, but it's pretty difficult to consume. Maybe I'm a retard. Or maybe I'm not retarded enough ?
I certainly don't deserve such an honored title.
?. Fair enough