The Constitution did not end. The claim is: the third Bankruptcy ended.
Every bankruptcy is supposed to be a 70 year period. (......headscratch where did I read that 70 year period before ....Sunday school? Church? )
What :Miller and :Gould claim is that they pieced some things together when they were considering the history of Hawaii, going from a kingdom to being part of the US. Running these 70 year intervals, plus 45 days + 3 days grace period, lands them on dec 7th 1941. Miller said the Japanese bombed all the "military installations". However, since, these operate under the auspices of the Postmaster-General, these were postal vessels and installations.
Hence, the Japanese Postal bombing the US postals. They were just 1 hour mistaken, necessitating FDR to declare war.
In case of US: third bankruptcy ended in 1999. During this period afterwards, UK had to vacate. During this vacancy, they seized the post office, putting them in control.
Then it becomes a bit more hazy, as they claim patent to the title 4 flag.
Also, they say all business is conducted under law of the sea, in effect turning us all into vessels. Courts are vessels in drydock. Showing up there means: trespass.
Business is conducted in a speech, which is a fraud from a parse syntax grammar point of view, as it does not deal with fact but opinion, coloring, etc. disqualifying contracts, treaties, etc.
Hence, the need to turn yourself into a fact -> : Miller, : Gould and a different way of presenting facts.
For the knowledge is with the ....etc ...
What I find interesting is the story. Very captivating. But when it comes to evidence, it is a bit hazy.
Just as with Nesara/ Gesara, the key docs are missing, and when asked for it, like in one of the videos by a Chinese guy, Miller becomes evasive: go to your library, it is done everywhere, 20 000 hours of study.
Another point of raising eyebrows, is that : Miller says, he gave his system for free to the Chinese, boasting all kinds of interesting details but no supporting evidence. Why give it free to .gov, whereas it is supposed to free people, who then have to pay 150 dollars and more for "a book" and other stuff.
An easier way would have been: ok Chinkies. You got 1.3 billion people. Pay me 1$ pp and I I'll teach every single one of them. To the chinks it is nothing, and it would put them in a way better position to do nice stuff with it.
What I notice is that these issues seem to focus on common law jurisdictions. In continental law jurisdictions, like the EU countries: Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, Austria .... there seems to be no information as to what this actually means.
I know of a few guys who are seriously engaged with this stuff, so I'll wait and see.
The Constitution did not end. The claim is: the third Bankruptcy ended.
Every bankruptcy is supposed to be a 70 year period. (......headscratch where did I read that 70 year period before ....Sunday school? Church? )
What :Miller and :Gould claim is that they pieced some things together when they were considering the history of Hawaii, going from a kingdom to being part of the US. Running these 70 year intervals, plus 45 days + 3 days grace period, lands them on dec 7th 1941. Miller said the Japanese bombed all the "military installations". However, since, these operate under the auspices of the Postmaster-General, these were postal vessels and installations.
Hence, the Japanese Postal bombing the US postals. They were just 1 hour mistaken, necessitating FDR to declare war.
In case of US: third bankruptcy ended in 1999. During this period afterwards, UK had to vacate. During this vacancy, they seized the post office, putting them in control.
Then it becomes a bit more hazy, as they claim patent to the title 4 flag.
Also, they say all business is conducted under law of the sea, in effect turning us all into vessels. Courts are vessels in drydock. Showing up there means: trespass.
Business is conducted in a speech, which is a fraud from a parse syntax grammar point of view, as it does not deal with fact but opinion, coloring, etc. disqualifying contracts, treaties, etc.
Hence, the need to turn yourself into a fact -> : Miller, : Gould and a different way of presenting facts.
For the knowledge is with the ....etc ...
What I find interesting is the story. Very captivating. But when it comes to evidence, it is a bit hazy.
Just as with Nesara/ Gesara, the key docs are missing, and when asked for it, like in one of the videos by a Chinese guy, Miller becomes evasive: go to your library, it is done everywhere, 20 000 hours of study.
Another point of raising eyebrows, is that : Miller says, he gave his system for free to the Chinese, boasting all kinds of interesting details but no supporting evidence. Why give it free to .gov, whereas it is supposed to free people, who then have to pay 150 dollars and more for "a book" and other stuff.
An easier way would have been: ok Chinkies. You got 1.3 billion people. Pay me 1$ pp and I I'll teach every single one of them. To the chinks it is nothing, and it would put them in a way better position to do nice stuff with it.
What I notice is that these issues seem to focus on common law jurisdictions. In continental law jurisdictions, like the EU countries: Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, Austria .... there seems to be no information as to what this actually means.
I know of a few guys who are seriously engaged with this stuff, so I'll wait and see.