Legacy MSM is well aware of the Streisand Effect and its power on the people...

So why do you think your leadership WANTS you to write about Crazy Q and the "cult of followers" ?? They MUST know that disavowing Q only emboldens those following and sharpens the resolve. Especially when the narrative they/you are offering is DANGEROUS, WHITE NATIONALISM. Why would they want MORE people interested and researching? You, and your peers, are driving more traffic to this site and assisting the cause.... Why? And why is your leadership asking you to do it? Wouldn't it be easier to just let our little "cult" discover that's it's all a bunch of bunk and dissolve??

Secondly, why, did NO ONE in Legacy MSM ever ask Donald Trump if "Q was real"?? Not one White House Correspondent had the fortitude to ask a very simple question that could have put this whole thing to bed. Instead, they asked him to Disavow the movement, which he never did. In fact, he doubled down and confirmed things through tweet misspellings and pointing out Q followers in crowds.

So MSM Lurker.... Your here to write a story about how CRAZY this movement is..... Instead, be bold, be brave and ask your leadership.... "Why? Why are we participating in giving this a "cult" a platform in which we know emboldens them? Why are we steering more vulnerable, disaffected Trump supporters to find these forums? And why didn't you instruct one of the WH minions to ask so we could play the soundbite on repeat of Trump dismissing Q altogether?"

Lastly, I implore ANYONE to ask Samantha Gunthrie about her Sources on the Jeffrey Epstein story that got blasted by leadership and then put on Project Veritas. Guaranteed, her "sources" were Q followers, and the evidence found through the Chans.

Something doesn't add up and you know it.