Which claim? That the constitution was instituted in 1789 and not 1776, or that the founding fathers were generally dead by 1871, almost a century after American independence?
If you're asking me to prove that Washington DC isn't owned by the Vatican or London - the obvious response is that it's not even clear what this claim would mean, legally. It was established as a US municipal corporation in 1871. Nothing about Vatican or London sovereignty or "ownership" (which itself is a bizarre claim; municipal corporations don't have "owners" in the first place).
Hey Dingle berry, balls whatever your name is ........you are a fucking bore dude!!!I Take it somewhere else!! The information is there, don't be fucking lazy!!
No, the United States did not default on its sovereign debt obligations in 1913, nor did the English establish sovereignty in the federal district of Washington DC at that time - that's an idea which is patently ridiculous, given that Washington DC has been governed by US federal law and courts, not British ones.
No government or court in the United States or the United Kingdom considers DC to be sovereign territory of any nation other than the United States.
Here's a novel idea that is practiced here.You don't get to show up demanding proof.You have to prove your statements.Autocrat,"I'm educated" language ain't gonna fly whistle britches.
Your claim?
Which claim? That the constitution was instituted in 1789 and not 1776, or that the founding fathers were generally dead by 1871, almost a century after American independence?
If you're asking me to prove that Washington DC isn't owned by the Vatican or London - the obvious response is that it's not even clear what this claim would mean, legally. It was established as a US municipal corporation in 1871. Nothing about Vatican or London sovereignty or "ownership" (which itself is a bizarre claim; municipal corporations don't have "owners" in the first place).
Also thanks for the proof!
You're welcome.
Hey Dingle berry, balls whatever your name is ........you are a fucking bore dude!!!I Take it somewhere else!! The information is there, don't be fucking lazy!!
Wrong Get your facts straight
Huh? Which of those claims are you disputing?
No, the United States did not default on its sovereign debt obligations in 1913, nor did the English establish sovereignty in the federal district of Washington DC at that time - that's an idea which is patently ridiculous, given that Washington DC has been governed by US federal law and courts, not British ones.
No government or court in the United States or the United Kingdom considers DC to be sovereign territory of any nation other than the United States.
Here's a novel idea that is practiced here.You don't get to show up demanding proof.You have to prove your statements.Autocrat,"I'm educated" language ain't gonna fly whistle britches.