I'm not trying to dis on Q. My question is, with 5000 drops, how do we know who is triggering which drop? I believe pompeo could very well have been, his posts time seemed to coincide with drops that exactly spoke to current events, best we could ascertain.
My fear is, without consistent feedback, it becomes a guessing game, looking at potential sources and finding number combos which match posts which seem to match events in your point of view.
Part of this may very well be my perception, I've not been with GAW for very long. I have no reason to doubt Q is real, quite far from it.
I guess I've got a healthy dose of scepticism left, and am not sure how this all plays out.... Seems to be part faith, part tarrot card reading.
Again, not trying to trivialize, just trying to figure stuff out like the rest.
Its easy when you stack a database with thousands of entries, good for any given scenario or event happening at the time.
I'd say thats awesome.
I'm not trying to dis on Q. My question is, with 5000 drops, how do we know who is triggering which drop? I believe pompeo could very well have been, his posts time seemed to coincide with drops that exactly spoke to current events, best we could ascertain.
My fear is, without consistent feedback, it becomes a guessing game, looking at potential sources and finding number combos which match posts which seem to match events in your point of view.
Part of this may very well be my perception, I've not been with GAW for very long. I have no reason to doubt Q is real, quite far from it.
I guess I've got a healthy dose of scepticism left, and am not sure how this all plays out.... Seems to be part faith, part tarrot card reading.
Again, not trying to trivialize, just trying to figure stuff out like the rest.
I can accept that. TY! ?