would love to see some speculation as to why he refused. my thoughts are that Roberts realizes that any Impeachment is a trap and Trump benefits no mater what the outcome.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
I say have Justice Thomas preside over the trial
constitution is very direct on who presides over impeachment.
Of the president, yes, but Trump is no longer the sitting president, although he is being impeached in relation to actions while president. It's a genuinely unusual situation with no precedent.
Actually it isn't. There was a post here yesterday or the day before talking about how congress could no longer impeach an individual because they were no longer an officer of the government, irregardless of their actions whilst serving as an officer of the government.
Actually it isn’t what? Unprecedented?
It's bc of Dem spite and fear of him.
Their Constitution is null and void.
after all this nonsense, I'd love to have a book of all of Sleepy Joe's classic quotes.
Karma is a bitch...
Kamala is a bitch
Bill Clinton is a rapist
Infowars.com
He is my favorite.
If Chief Justice says No, then its not SCOTUS' pick, its Senate's pick. Extremely bad in all respects. I guess they may bypass any SCOTUS judge at that point to reach their goal. Not good. And maybe why Roberts saying No is part of their plan.