The signature matching being unlawful would necessitate either a class action lawsuit either by voters or a normal lawsuit by electoral candidates against whoever has statutory authority over the elections in the state/county, I.E. The People of Maricopa County vs. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, since in Arizona, each county has a Board of Supervisors who hold statutory authority and appoint an Elections Director.
The legal standing for the lawsuit, as I understand it, would stem from the fact that the Board of Supervisors neglected to perform the duties of their office, and in so doing, defrauded both the citizenry of that county and the electoral candidates.
10 days of darkness.
If the military is ready for cyber-attacks with a non-cyber workaround, why would the cyber-attacks be only [attempts]?
The answer is in the question. If the cyber-attacks are unsuccessful, then they are only attempts. It implies that the military has anticipated such attacks and has a plan in place to counteract them.
You'll want to contact the Register of Deeds office and the Clerk of Superior Court office for the county the land is in.
Land records include documents such as deeds, wills, mortgages, court orders, devorces, and liens. If you want to fully understand the legal status of a parcel of land, you need to search records in both offices.
The most shocking answer would be Barron Trump, but that's a rabbit hole even I am hesitant to dive into.
You don't, because that's not what it's designed for. Submarines that are designed to allow exit at depth have airlocks or moonpools, which account for that pressure differential
I think that's more of a message to Project Veritas.
Only where laws and executive orders apply to them. If there is no legal procedure which concerns the de-classification of documents, then it stands to reason that the President only needs to give the order, which has been proven to be done for at least some of the documents that were seized.
I never claimed rainfall wasn't important, and I never will.
Personally, and I predicted this in the past, I believe the Deep State is trying to engineer a famine ahead of an insurrection.
FFS you have so many rivers, can the midwest not compensate for the lack of rainfall?
Ah, in which case, see Article 2 of the constitution:
“The President … shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”
Your counterargument falls apart under Article 2 of the Constitution, which vests ALL executive powers in the President. The president ultimately has the authority to dictate to all agencies beneath him what is and is not vital to national security, and what is or is not an authorized location. The agencies do not hold authority over the President. The 102 documents he took with him, if they are all pertaining to the alphabet soup spying on him during his campaign, were declassified before he left office.
Additionally, the 2012 case law resulting from the sock drawer case establishes that it is the President's responsibility and sole authority to separate personal records from presidential records. No other agency under the executive branch can supersede that authority.
No. Pardons can only be issued for someone who has been convicted of a crime by the Judiciary branch and, according to the Supreme Court, a president cannot issue a pardon for future convictions.
Impeachment and criminal prosecution are separate procedures. Congress can impeach and remove him from office, and then the DOJ can prosecute him criminally.
Not only that, but 2012 case law renders the definitions outlined in the PRA a moot point, so they can't even charge him based on that because any records he took with him when he left office are his personal records.
Everyone here knows that the charges against Trump are bupkis and I wager that any sane prosecutor would likely not have continued pushing this into court. I'm inclined to believe that this entire fiasco is part of the plan. Isn't it possible that Patriots are the ones behind this, setting precedent for actual, legitimate arrests?
Not necessarily a black hat, not necessarily a white hat. These agencies are full of ordinary people, and any one of them can wind up getting in way over their head before they figure out which way is up. I could argue that this is how the people at the top usually insulate themselves from the underlings carrying out their orders.
Would he not still be a Senator then, and thus hold an office?
I kind of miss the bits of subtlety that old political cartoons had. Rather than labeling absolute every element, only the ones which are unclear are labeled. I hope one day for a return to the laconicism of educated men.
The more participation GEOTUS has in elections from supporters, the harder and more obviously the Deep State will have to cheat to make up for it. The more blatant the number discrepancies are, the harder it will be for the Deep State to cover it up and prevent normies from realizing what's really going on.
Tucker can choose to terminate that contract if Fox tries to silence him and a push becomes a shove in the courts.
Here's some key information for those interested in the legal definitions of records.
When an outgoing president intends to take documents with him, he is required to separate personal records from presidential records. Any documents which are not by definition Presidential records are therefore personal records. Personal records are the property of that outgoing President, and are defined as follows:
“’personal records’ means all documentary materials of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.”
Presidential records, however, are owned by the public and are placed into NARA custody when the President leaves office. The PRA specifically states:
“’Presidential records’ means documentary materials created or received by the President, the President’s immediate staff, or a unit or individual of the Executive Office of the President whose function is to advise or assist the President, in the course of conducting activities which relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.”
The definitions are important, because it means that any document which was not provided to the President for the purpose of fulfilling the duties of his office, or to anyone in his cabinet for the purpose of advising or assisting him in fulfilling those duties, can be treated as a personal record, so long as they have no clear bearing on the completion of the duties of the office of President.
Thank you for the technical term, I forgot it.
In hindsight, I could have clarified that just because a controlled burn is a legitimate strategy, it does not necessarily mean that this is what is occurring.
I found Barnes' explanation profoundly educational. The 2nd Article of the constitution is exceedingly clear.
Treacherous Tortoise?