The same is true with the UN. The UN has a terrible record of abuse. But it does not matter, the end justifies the means. If their bid for the presidency requires a Traitor and a Deviant, who cares, actually all the better to control my dear.
"Everyone is familiar with the term, “the ends justify the means,” however, the disturbing reality of the mentality behind it goes unnoticed. Saul Alinsky describes it best in Rules for Radicals by describing means and ends morality. As far as the left is concerned, preventing yourself from doing what is necessary for the greater good is an act of selfishness. People who are more concerned with their own salvation, as Alinsky states, care not for the good of humanity because they are not willing to corrupt themselves in pursuit of a better world. In a twisted sort of way then, no morality becomes a higher form of morality. Those who are willing to corrupt their own soul are of a higher virtue. The good of humanity is of greater importance to them than their own well-being. This means that they are willing to lie, cheat, steal and even kill to achieve their ends. The ends after all, justify the means. Alinsky mocked those who lacked the willingness to corrupt themselves. He referred to them as means and ends moralists. People who refused to take any action at all out of fear of going against their misguided views of morality. In some cases, Alinsky was right. He referred to the passivity of the Germans who willingly sat back knowing their country was systematically eliminating an entire race of people as means and moralists. In this case however, fighting for what is right is not necessarily corrupting yourself. Doing what is necessary to defeat evil is hardly corrupting. What it boils down to then, is who is defining what is right."
from this article: I don't agree with all of this article but the above excerpt is extraordinarily perceptive and worthy of understanding.
The same is true with the UN. The UN has a terrible record of abuse. But it does not matter, the end justifies the means. If their bid for the presidency requires a Traitor and a Deviant, who cares, actually all the better to control my dear.
"Everyone is familiar with the term, “the ends justify the means,” however, the disturbing reality of the mentality behind it goes unnoticed. Saul Alinsky describes it best in Rules for Radicals by describing means and ends morality. As far as the left is concerned, preventing yourself from doing what is necessary for the greater good is an act of selfishness. People who are more concerned with their own salvation, as Alinsky states, care not for the good of humanity because they are not willing to corrupt themselves in pursuit of a better world. In a twisted sort of way then, no morality becomes a higher form of morality. Those who are willing to corrupt their own soul are of a higher virtue. The good of humanity is of greater importance to them than their own well-being. This means that they are willing to lie, cheat, steal and even kill to achieve their ends. The ends after all, justify the means. Alinsky mocked those who lacked the willingness to corrupt themselves. He referred to them as means and ends moralists. People who refused to take any action at all out of fear of going against their misguided views of morality. In some cases, Alinsky was right. He referred to the passivity of the Germans who willingly sat back knowing their country was systematically eliminating an entire race of people as means and moralists. In this case however, fighting for what is right is not necessarily corrupting yourself. Doing what is necessary to defeat evil is hardly corrupting. What it boils down to then, is who is defining what is right."
from this article: I don't agree with all of this article but the above excerpt is extraordinarily perceptive and worthy of understanding.
https://defenseofournation.com/media-corruption/q-the-deceptive-nature-of-communism-on-full-display/?fbclid=IwAR28fa9VZ7wEIKjujPXHXGE04AGBqRC1dBGLpTiPMvHditShCNkVBTDq1dA