The recent bill Trump had signed that gave the citizens the $600 stimulus was saddled with ridiculous pork. Does anyone question how they can spend money on "Gender Studies in Pakistan"? The answer is, Constitutionally, they can't. How about all the foreign aid? Again, this is highly questionable Constitutionally.
The Constitution gives Congress the power to spend in two areas, and two areas only - the general welfare and the common defense. That is it.
Now, the general welfare law has gone through much interpretation through the years (https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/article-i/clauses/755) but the core of it remains the same - Congress generally can only spend on the general welfare.
The thing is, things like "Gender Studies in Pakistan" would not hold up as spending allowed by Congress under previous court interpretations. Congress literally violates the Constitution at ever turn with their pork laden projects.
The Founding Fathers wanted to limit Congress spending power, but they left the "general welfare" clause open to a lot of interpretation by Congress. However, Congress has been challenged in court before.
Basically, people should be seething that Congress has reached a point they feel they can spend money on whatever they want when the Constitution specifically limits spending to two areas.
This is an argument I always bring up... “where in the constitution does it grant the federal government to do xyz”. Most people don’t care. But the point is, how is congress always allowed to do things, spend money on things, that’s clearly unconstitutional?