There are people out there who work for the crown and the deep state who try to discredit it and that’s what all these doubters see so they think it’s debunked. The gaslighting is everywhere.
Yes. It was bunk in 1925, it was bunk in 1933, it was bunk in 1944, it was bunk in 1953-59, it was bunk in 1976, and every year in between and since, it was bunk.
I think Lin Wood has pushed it, or at least implied it. Maybe he believes it, maybe it's disinformation, or maybe it's less mindfuck to talk about "UNITED STATES IN ALL CAPS ERMAHGERD" than "extraterrestrial aliens"? Still bunk.
Connect what you know to be real, to what you perceive to be real, to what the purveyors of this sort of stuff want you to think it real. Perhaps the connections are valid, even if the connectors are not? Q has communicated this way in the past, and vice versa.
You have to understand how it's constitutional, in order to fight it, at least if you're going at it head-on.
Alternatively, just move all of your economy to crypto. That's easier said than done, today, but it's getting easier. You can even get gold fringe for your wallet.
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS (Supreme Court of the United States 1795)
CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70 "Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”
You know all of the texts of these cases is available online? Go find out what happened to the first person who cited 3 US 54 in this way, and let us know.
That’s the thing. You can’t go into the courts that belong to them and expect to get the verdict you want. It doesn’t work like that. There are proper ways to go about this and people have already started doing this years ago. I guess you’ll just be surprised like all the normies when this is over.
There is an interestingly-named company that deals in registering corporations for people, and the 1871-tards think that's their huckleberry.
so are you saying that all this talk about the 1871 stuff it total bunk?
There are people out there who work for the crown and the deep state who try to discredit it and that’s what all these doubters see so they think it’s debunked. The gaslighting is everywhere.
I don't have to debunk anything. OP says there's a bankruptcy case. I say there ain't. Link it.
And I’m saying it’s fake shit to distract from the real shit.
Yes. It was bunk in 1925, it was bunk in 1933, it was bunk in 1944, it was bunk in 1953-59, it was bunk in 1976, and every year in between and since, it was bunk.
I think Lin Wood has pushed it, or at least implied it. Maybe he believes it, maybe it's disinformation, or maybe it's less mindfuck to talk about "UNITED STATES IN ALL CAPS ERMAHGERD" than "extraterrestrial aliens"? Still bunk.
Connect what you know to be real, to what you perceive to be real, to what the purveyors of this sort of stuff want you to think it real. Perhaps the connections are valid, even if the connectors are not? Q has communicated this way in the past, and vice versa.
Yes and the Federal Reserve is also a legitimate operation. Very contsituonal. Nothing to see here, look the other way.
Federal Reserve is constitutional, that doesn't make it right.
The Federal Reserve is privately owned, it is not constitutional.
You have to understand how it's constitutional, in order to fight it, at least if you're going at it head-on.
Alternatively, just move all of your economy to crypto. That's easier said than done, today, but it's getting easier. You can even get gold fringe for your wallet.
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADMINISTRATORS (Supreme Court of the United States 1795)
CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70 "Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”
You know all of the texts of these cases is available online? Go find out what happened to the first person who cited 3 US 54 in this way, and let us know.
That’s the thing. You can’t go into the courts that belong to them and expect to get the verdict you want. It doesn’t work like that. There are proper ways to go about this and people have already started doing this years ago. I guess you’ll just be surprised like all the normies when this is over.
No. Look into it
Just dismissed it 2 hours ago
https://www.inforuptcy.com/browse-filings/florida-northern-bankruptcy-court/4:20-bk-40375/bankruptcy-case-united-states-corporation-company
Until I see this document on an official government website or Trump himself read it... I'm calling larp.
That said, I do believe this or something like it is coming.
Just dismissed it 2 hours ago
https://www.inforuptcy.com/browse-filings/florida-northern-bankruptcy-court/4:20-bk-40375/bankruptcy-case-united-states-corporation-company
Trump doesn't wish to control and micromanage us like the Communists do.