1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah I'll have to dig more, but from what I've seen so far this looks like a violation of free speech. Doesn't matter if you agree with why they are protesting or not. If they were protesting on the campus without causing anyone harm then Abbot is out of line on this one.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

100%. I will be praying for your dogs recovery, I recommend looking into things like the keto pet sanctuary for resources on feeding them going forward. https://www.ketopetsanctuary.com/

I lost my best friend just 2 years ago at the age of 7. We aren't 100% sure what killed him, but there's a large chance it was cancer.

I've never connected with another animal or soul on this earth like I did with him. He was originally my girlfriends dog, but over time we both saw him as our son. I haven't gone a single day without thinking about him since. I hope you and your furry fren get many more wonderful years together.

4
Drawdraw45 4 points ago +4 / -0

The thing is though you're here commenting on the same one as us right now. I don't personally believe we all individually shift timelines. That doesn't logically hold up. However I do believe our collective consciousness could affect our shared timeline. Which in that case it's even more important that we are allergic to dooming.

1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

They flash that symbol both inverted and non-inverted. It's actually more representative of being 666 if not fully inverted. You can see countless photos of the mk ultra bots throwing it up like this over their eyes.

8
Drawdraw45 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't trust her. From the interviews I've seen she rarely is able to produce much substance when pressed further than anything surface level.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

The establishment of Islam does not hide neither. It does not change its name nor identity. You can't bring up different sects or followers of doctrine either because the Christian church is just as fragmented. But this fact that it doesn't hide its surface identity proves nothing of its merrit, nor does it absolve it of any of its sins.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +3 / -1

The Roman catholic church hides very very much. Way deep in its archives. Its like the Smithsonian on steroids. To fully awaken you must begin to question everything you were born and raised to believe. No stone unturned. There is much darkness hidden deep in the veils of the Catholic church. You just have to open your eyes and be willing to actually look.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll have to dig up the link but there's easily searchable videos of Ron Paul saying that both the US and Israel created Hamas.

1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +7 / -6

There's more reasons than that to be down on Flynn.

5
Drawdraw45 5 points ago +5 / -0

Extremely great writeup. It's also important to note that Hitler potentially could have been a Rothschild bastard. Also Ron Paul many years ago was saying the US and Israel helped create Hamas.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +3 / -1

Flynn not only performed an occultic prayer. Not only berated his followers which is something his brother has been doing for awhile now. But he also threw up the 666 hand symbol on Banon. I don't trust him one bit. I think he just exists right now to muddy up the waters for the patriots.

0
Drawdraw45 0 points ago +1 / -1

Agreed. Also I haven't trusted Jan at all since the jump. After she started doing more side interviews, the more questions I heard her answer. The more I noticed the lack of substance from her responses.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +3 / -1

This. Plus did you see him throw up the 666 hand symbol in a Steve Bannon interview? It wasn't a speaking hand gesture either. He just randomly threw it up in front of his face like all the other evil celebrity puppets do.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +3 / -1

I mean I don't even think Flynn is on our side at this point. Definitely not worth following or listening to. Provides little to no public value. Not saying he can't be engaging in purposeful misinfo, but there's too many red flags surrounding him and his brother.

8
Drawdraw45 8 points ago +9 / -1

How old were you when the Rothschilds were heavily involved in the rotten inception of the modern day nation state of Israel?

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +4 / -2

This scripture itself was in reference to the old testament, and used to logically dispel the Jews reasoning to stone him.

The new testament wasn't assembled till long after Jesus was gone. We still don't know for certain who many of the authors of the various books were. We include letters from Paul to the churches as God ordained gospel, when he never walked with Jesus, and was no different than any of us in the modern times receiving the spirit and then giving guidance. Those letters were meant specifically to guide those early churches and have no business being followed as the unbreakable and infallible words of God.

Why did Jesus never reference a book that was coming? Why did he not reference this new scripture that would be assembled and adhered to as if directly given from God himself? Why didn't he oversee the process of creating such scriptures if "the word" is so holy and important. Why did the catholics play such a large role in what books ended up being New Testament Canon? Why did they go about slaughtering the early gnostics and burning anything they deemed not canon or blasphemous?

Why are such important things lost in translation? Everyone places such high value on "the word", and the word is supposed to be so holy and above the errors of man. And part of this stems from John 1 and the scriptures stating in the beginning was the word. However, the more ancient Greek translation is logos. And logos has a much deeper meaning than word. Words imply what is written before us, and mistakenly people envision the scriptures always being there. But in reality logos also means reason and plan. It is also the thought and divine reasoning of God that gives order to all existence.

Also why for English speakers was our most sacred scriptures ordered to be translated and left in the name of a demonologist? King James was a demonologist and very likely used the help of Sir Francis Bacon to translate the KJV version. Both very prominent Free Masons. And it is in their version where the reduction of the more in depth concept of logos to word happens.

I believe in Jesus, I believe that a large percentage of what we read in the Bible is truth. But I don't believe Jesus ever intended us to be waiting for his New Testament book he never spoke of to drop. Nor do I view it as the infallible word of God. That is a trap in of itself because you can find many logical inconsistencies that aren't aligned within it.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

This idiot saying that the military acting on their own is not in line with this country would have absolutely been a Tory. No you fucking dolt, this nation was founded on the overthrowing of a corrupt government. I do not trust Flynn one bit.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except they claim that they were never in possession of such a document, nor was it ever on display there. Now they could be lying, but also ask yourself why a document such as this would have ever been on display there.

The other red flag word in this letter is Illuminati. Now I do know there is documented literature pointing to the existence of this order around that time era. But did Albert Pike ever reference them in any of his other 100% verifiable writings? I think it's all too convenient to be true, really comes off as a larp.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +4 / -1

Stop posting this as if it is 100% verifiably true. Afaik there is no documented proof that this supposed letter by Pike ever existed. Also the letter is using the word Nazi in 1871, when that term wasn't even coined till around 1926. I'm not saying it's 100% bullshit, but should definitely be skeptical of its authenticity.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Was thinking the same thing. What are the supposed sources for these quotes? When and where did they originate? I know he supposedly wrote the book Morals and Dogma, is this where these quotes allegedly come from?

view more: Next ›